inclusionai · Open weights
Ling 3.1 Flash
Ling 3.1 Flash is inclusionAI's hybrid reasoning model for coding, tool use, planning, and long-context agent workflows. It has 560B total parameters with 25B active parameters per token. Thinking is enabled by default and can be turned off in settings.
- Reasoning
- Tools
- Structured output
- Input
- Text
- Output
- Text
- Reasoning effort
- none · low · medium · high
- Discovery tier
- Open weights
Pricing
USD per 1M tokens- Input
- $0.075
- Output
- $0.22
- Cache read
- $0.015
Reference prices as published by the model provider. API example
Specifications
- Context window
- 262.1K
- Max output
- 32.8K
- Average output (7 days)
- 7.8K tokens
- Longer than 99% of 465 models
Side by side
Compare models
Put Ling 3.1 Flash next to up to three other models. The comparison stays in the link, so you can share it.
Public evaluations
Benchmarks
Independent evaluation results, with how each score ranks among the models in the Noumen catalog.
Intelligence Index
41.1
Better than 86% of 326 scored models
Agentic work
AutomationBench-AA
61.7%Workflow automation, penalized for guardrail violations
Better than 86% of 173 scored models
AutomationBench-AA tasks completed
23.6%Workflows finished end to end without a guardrail violation
Better than 69% of 173 scored models
AA-Briefcasev1.1
1,397 EloAgentic knowledge work, rated head to head
Better than 75% of 166 scored models
GDPval-AAv2.1
1,617 EloEconomically valuable occupational tasks, rated head to head
Better than 87% of 187 scored models
Document reasoning
GDP.pdf
10.0%Professional reasoning over PDF documents, all-pass rate
Better than 38% of 171 scored models
AA-LCRv1.1
83.0%Reasoning across long documents
Better than 90% of 309 scored models
MLCR-AA
12.2%Long-context reasoning over medical records
Better than 47% of 121 scored models
Reasoning and knowledge
Humanity’s Last Exam
39.4%Expert-level questions across academic fields
Better than 75% of 323 scored models
Coding
Terminal-Benchv4.0
33.3%Practical software engineering in a terminal
Better than 80% of 171 scored models
SciCode
54.1%Scientific computing in Python
Better than 69% of 174 scored models
Legacy evaluations
AA-LCR (unversioned)
83.0%Long-context reasoning, earlier grading
Better than 90% of 309 scored models
Scores from Artificial Analysis, updated Oct 26, 2026. Artificial Analysis
Live routing data
Performance and reliability
Recent averages across requests routed for this model. Your own speed depends on prompt length, reasoning effort and load.
- Throughput
- 91.2 tok/s
- Faster than 58% of 250 models
- Time to first token
- 3.2 s
- Quicker than 55% of 250 models
- Prompt cache hits
- 80.7%
- About $0.0266 per 1M input tokens with caching
- Request success (24h)
- 100.0%
- Reliable
Cache hits are the share of input tokens recently served from a prompt cache across all requests. They are not a forecast of your own hit rate.
- Healthy (98% or more)
- Degraded (90–98%)
- Down (under 90%)
- No requests
Developers
Use it through the API
Noumen’s API is OpenAI-compatible: any Chat Completions client works with a base URL and a key.
curl https://www.noumen.xyz/api/v1/chat/completions \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $NOUMEN_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"model": "inclusionai/ling-3.1-flash",
"reasoning_effort": "medium",
"messages": [{ "role": "user", "content": "Explain this stack trace." }]
}'import os
from openai import OpenAI
client = OpenAI(base_url="https://www.noumen.xyz/api/v1", api_key=os.environ["NOUMEN_API_KEY"])
reply = client.chat.completions.create(
model="inclusionai/ling-3.1-flash",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Explain this stack trace."}],
)
print(reply.choices[0].message.content)inclusionai
Related models
Other inclusionai models, starting with the same family.