inclusionai · Efficient
Ling 3.0 Flash Thinking
Ling-3.0-flash Thinking enables visible reasoning on inclusionAI's token-efficient 124B-parameter Mixture-of-Experts model for harder coding, tool use, planning, and production-scale agent workflows.
- Reasoning
- Tools
- Input
- Text
- Output
- Text
- Reasoning effort
- none · minimal · low · medium · high · xhigh
- Discovery tier
- Efficient
Pricing
USD per 1M tokens- Input
- $0.075
- Output
- $0.22
- Cache read
- $0.015
Reference prices as published by the model provider. API example
Specifications
- Context window
- 262.1K
- Max output
- 32.8K
- Average output (7 days)
- 243 tokens
- Longer than 25% of 465 models
Side by side
Compare models
Put Ling 3.0 Flash Thinking next to up to three other models. The comparison stays in the link, so you can share it.
Public evaluations
Benchmarks
Independent evaluation results, with how each score ranks among the models in the Noumen catalog.
Intelligence Index
20.1
Better than 49% of 326 scored models
Indexes
Coding Index
50.6Composite of the coding evaluations
Better than 48% of 168 scored models
Agentic work
AutomationBench-AA
3.2%Workflow automation, penalized for guardrail violations
Better than 20% of 173 scored models
AutomationBench-AA tasks completed
0.6%Workflows finished end to end without a guardrail violation
Better than 29% of 173 scored models
AA-Briefcasev1.1
798 EloAgentic knowledge work, rated head to head
Better than 28% of 166 scored models
GDPval-AAv2.1
948 EloEconomically valuable occupational tasks, rated head to head
Better than 31% of 187 scored models
Document reasoning
GDP.pdf
5.4%Professional reasoning over PDF documents, all-pass rate
Better than 23% of 171 scored models
AA-LCRv1.1
73.0%Reasoning across long documents
Better than 54% of 309 scored models
MLCR-AA
5.0%Long-context reasoning over medical records
Better than 13% of 121 scored models
Reasoning and knowledge
Humanity’s Last Exam
23.7%Expert-level questions across academic fields
Better than 54% of 323 scored models
GPQA Diamond
85.5%Graduate-level science questions
Better than 61% of 291 scored models
Coding
Terminal-Benchv4.0
0.0%Practical software engineering in a terminal
Better than 0% of 171 scored models
SciCode
42.0%Scientific computing in Python
Better than 25% of 174 scored models
Legacy evaluations
AA-LCR (unversioned)
73.0%Long-context reasoning, earlier grading
Better than 54% of 309 scored models
Scores from Artificial Analysis, updated Oct 26, 2026. Artificial Analysis
Live routing data
Performance and reliability
Recent averages across requests routed for this model. Your own speed depends on prompt length, reasoning effort and load.
- Request success (24h)
- 100.0%
- Reliable
- Healthy (98% or more)
- Degraded (90–98%)
- Down (under 90%)
- No requests
Developers
Use it through the API
Noumen’s API is OpenAI-compatible: any Chat Completions client works with a base URL and a key.
curl https://www.noumen.xyz/api/v1/chat/completions \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $NOUMEN_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"model": "inclusionai/ling-3.0-flash:thinking",
"reasoning_effort": "medium",
"messages": [{ "role": "user", "content": "Explain this stack trace." }]
}'import os
from openai import OpenAI
client = OpenAI(base_url="https://www.noumen.xyz/api/v1", api_key=os.environ["NOUMEN_API_KEY"])
reply = client.chat.completions.create(
model="inclusionai/ling-3.0-flash:thinking",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Explain this stack trace."}],
)
print(reply.choices[0].message.content)inclusionai
Related models
Other inclusionai models, starting with the same family.