upstage · Efficient
Solar Mini 4
Upstage's compact 35B-parameter mixture-of-experts model with 3B active parameters and a 524K context window. Built for fast, cost-efficient agentic tasks, with strong Korean and English support.
- Tools
- Structured output
- Input
- Text
- Output
- Text
- Discovery tier
- Efficient
Pricing
USD per 1M tokens- Input
- $0.05
- Output
- $0.20
- Cache read
- $0.005
Reference prices as published by the model provider. API example
Specifications
- Context window
- 524.3K
- Max output
- 131.1K
- Average output (7 days)
- 561 tokens
- Longer than 53% of 468 models
Side by side
Solar Mini 4 compared
Specifications, prices, speed and benchmark scores next to each other. Benchmarks below show every compared model too.
| Solar Mini 4upstageThis model | GPT 5.1 Codex MaxOpenAIRemove | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | upstage | OpenAI |
| Discovery tier | Efficient | Frontier |
| Added | Sep 23, 2026 | Dec 4, 2025 |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 524.29KBest | 400K |
| Max output | 131.07KBest | 128K |
| Average output | 561 tokens | — |
| Pricing, USD per 1M tokens | ||
| Input | $0.05Best | $2.50 |
| Output | $0.20Best | $20.00 |
| Cache read | $0.005Best | $0.25 |
| Performance | ||
| Throughput | 90.6 tok/s | — |
| Time to first token | 2.2 s | — |
| Request success (24h) | 89.1% | — |
| Benchmark indexes | ||
| Intelligence Index | 24.1Best | 23.7 |
| Math Index | — | 95.7 |
| Capabilities | ||
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tools | Yes | Yes |
| Vision | No | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | Yes |
| PDF input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning effort | — | none, minimal, low, medium, high, xhigh |
Public evaluations
Benchmarks
Independent evaluation results, with how each score ranks among the models in the Noumen catalog.
- Solar Mini 4
- GPT 5.1 Codex Max
Intelligence Index
- Solar Mini 424.1
- GPT 5.1 Codex Max23.7
Solar Mini 4: Better than 59% of 326 scored models
Indexes
Math Index
Composite of the math evaluations
- Solar Mini 4: —
- GPT 5.1 Codex Max: 95.7
Agentic work
AutomationBench-AA
Workflow automation, penalized for guardrail violations
- Solar Mini 4: 22.3%
- GPT 5.1 Codex Max: —
AutomationBench-AA tasks completed
Workflows finished end to end without a guardrail violation
- Solar Mini 4: 2.4%
- GPT 5.1 Codex Max: —
AA-Briefcasev1.1
Agentic knowledge work, rated head to head
- Solar Mini 4: 867 Elo
- GPT 5.1 Codex Max: —
GDPval-AAv2.1
Economically valuable occupational tasks, rated head to head
- Solar Mini 4: 1,085 Elo
- GPT 5.1 Codex Max: —
Document reasoning
GDP.pdf
Professional reasoning over PDF documents, all-pass rate
- Solar Mini 4: 5.0%
- GPT 5.1 Codex Max: —
AA-LCRv1.1
Reasoning across long documents
- Solar Mini 4: 83.3%Top
- GPT 5.1 Codex Max: 69.3%
MLCR-AA
Long-context reasoning over medical records
- Solar Mini 4: 6.7%
- GPT 5.1 Codex Max: —
Reasoning and knowledge
Humanity’s Last Exam
Expert-level questions across academic fields
- Solar Mini 4: 25.8%Top
- GPT 5.1 Codex Max: 25.7%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level science questions
- Solar Mini 4: —
- GPT 5.1 Codex Max: 86.0%
MMLU-Pro
Multi-subject knowledge and reasoning
- Solar Mini 4: —
- GPT 5.1 Codex Max: 86.0%
IFBench
Following precise output instructions
- Solar Mini 4: —
- GPT 5.1 Codex Max: 70.0%
Coding
Terminal-Benchv4.0
Practical software engineering in a terminal
- Solar Mini 4: 1.0%
- GPT 5.1 Codex Max: —
SciCode
Scientific computing in Python
- Solar Mini 4: 47.6%
- GPT 5.1 Codex Max: —
LiveCodeBench
Recent competitive programming problems
- Solar Mini 4: —
- GPT 5.1 Codex Max: 84.9%
Math
AIME 2025
Competition mathematics, 2025 problems
- Solar Mini 4: —
- GPT 5.1 Codex Max: 95.7%
Legacy evaluations
Terminal-Bench Hard
Earlier terminal task suite
- Solar Mini 4: —
- GPT 5.1 Codex Max: 34.8%
τ²-Bench Telecom
Tool use in a customer-support simulation
- Solar Mini 4: —
- GPT 5.1 Codex Max: 83.0%
AA-LCR (unversioned)
Long-context reasoning, earlier grading
- Solar Mini 4: 83.3%Top
- GPT 5.1 Codex Max: 69.3%
Scores from Artificial Analysis, updated Oct 26, 2026. Artificial Analysis
Live routing data
Performance and reliability
Recent averages across requests routed for this model. Your own speed depends on prompt length, reasoning effort and load.
- Throughput
- 90.6 tok/s
- Faster than 59% of 253 models
- Time to first token
- 2.2 s
- Quicker than 72% of 253 models
- Prompt cache hits
- 22.9%
- About $0.0397 per 1M input tokens with caching
- Request success (24h)
- 0.0%
- Failing
Cache hits are the share of input tokens recently served from a prompt cache across all requests. They are not a forecast of your own hit rate.
- Healthy (98% or more)
- Degraded (90–98%)
- Down (under 90%)
- No requests
Developers
Use it through the API
Noumen’s API is OpenAI-compatible: any Chat Completions client works with a base URL and a key.
curl https://www.noumen.xyz/api/v1/chat/completions \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $NOUMEN_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"model": "upstage/solar-mini4",
"messages": [{ "role": "user", "content": "Explain this stack trace." }]
}'import os
from openai import OpenAI
client = OpenAI(base_url="https://www.noumen.xyz/api/v1", api_key=os.environ["NOUMEN_API_KEY"])
reply = client.chat.completions.create(
model="upstage/solar-mini4",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Explain this stack trace."}],
)
print(reply.choices[0].message.content)upstage
Related models
Other upstage models, starting with the same family.