upstage · Efficient
Solar Pro 4 Thinking
Upstage's Solar Pro 4 with reasoning enabled for harder agentic workflows, document-intensive work, coding, planning, and analysis across a 524K-token context window.
- Reasoning
- Tools
- Structured output
- Input
- Text
- Output
- Text
- Reasoning effort
- none · low · medium · high
- Discovery tier
- Efficient
Pricing
USD per 1M tokens- Input
- $0.03
- Output
- $0.12
- Cache read
- $0.006
Reference prices as published by the model provider. API example
Specifications
- Context window
- 524.3K
- Max output
- 131.1K
- Average output (7 days)
- 1.7K tokens
- Longer than 88% of 465 models
Side by side
Compare models
Put Solar Pro 4 Thinking next to up to three other models. The comparison stays in the link, so you can share it.
Public evaluations
Benchmarks
Independent evaluation results, with how each score ranks among the models in the Noumen catalog.
Intelligence Index
26.6
Better than 67% of 326 scored models
Agentic work
AutomationBench-AA
13.6%Workflow automation, penalized for guardrail violations
Better than 35% of 173 scored models
AutomationBench-AA tasks completed
2.4%Workflows finished end to end without a guardrail violation
Better than 37% of 173 scored models
AA-Briefcasev1.1
1,093 EloAgentic knowledge work, rated head to head
Better than 51% of 166 scored models
GDPval-AAv2.1
1,106 EloEconomically valuable occupational tasks, rated head to head
Better than 45% of 187 scored models
Document reasoning
GDP.pdf
7.0%Professional reasoning over PDF documents, all-pass rate
Better than 30% of 171 scored models
AA-LCRv1.1
70.7%Reasoning across long documents
Better than 51% of 309 scored models
Reasoning and knowledge
Humanity’s Last Exam
29.8%Expert-level questions across academic fields
Better than 62% of 323 scored models
GPQA Diamond
89.1%Graduate-level science questions
Better than 72% of 291 scored models
Coding
Terminal-Benchv4.0
0.0%Practical software engineering in a terminal
Better than 0% of 171 scored models
SciCode
48.0%Scientific computing in Python
Better than 44% of 174 scored models
Legacy evaluations
AA-LCR (unversioned)
70.7%Long-context reasoning, earlier grading
Better than 51% of 309 scored models
Scores from Artificial Analysis, updated Oct 26, 2026. Artificial Analysis
Live routing data
Performance and reliability
Recent averages across requests routed for this model. Your own speed depends on prompt length, reasoning effort and load.
- Prompt cache hits
- 19.8%
- About $0.0253 per 1M input tokens with caching
- Request success (24h)
- 99.6%
- Reliable
Cache hits are the share of input tokens recently served from a prompt cache across all requests. They are not a forecast of your own hit rate.
- Healthy (98% or more)
- Degraded (90–98%)
- Down (under 90%)
- No requests
Developers
Use it through the API
Noumen’s API is OpenAI-compatible: any Chat Completions client works with a base URL and a key.
curl https://www.noumen.xyz/api/v1/chat/completions \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $NOUMEN_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"model": "upstage/solar-pro4:thinking",
"reasoning_effort": "medium",
"messages": [{ "role": "user", "content": "Explain this stack trace." }]
}'import os
from openai import OpenAI
client = OpenAI(base_url="https://www.noumen.xyz/api/v1", api_key=os.environ["NOUMEN_API_KEY"])
reply = client.chat.completions.create(
model="upstage/solar-pro4:thinking",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Explain this stack trace."}],
)
print(reply.choices[0].message.content)upstage
Related models
Other upstage models, starting with the same family.