Google · Open weights
Gemma 3 4B IT
Gemma 3 has a large, 128K context window, multilingual support in over 140 languages, and is available in more sizes than previous versions.
- PDF input
- Input
- Text
- Output
- Text
- Discovery tier
- Open weights
Pricing
USD per 1M tokens- Input
- $0.20
- Output
- $0.20
Reference prices as published by the model provider. API example
Specifications
- Context window
- 128K
- Max output
- 8.2K
- Average output (7 days)
- 115 tokens
- Longer than 11% of 468 models
Side by side
Gemma 3 4B IT compared
Specifications, prices, speed and benchmark scores next to each other. Benchmarks below show every compared model too.
| Gemma 3 4B ITGoogleThis model | Gemma 4 26B A4B ThinkingGoogleRemove | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Discovery tier | Open weights | Open weights |
| Added | Jan 1, 2024 | Apr 2, 2026 |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 128K | 262.14KBest |
| Max output | 8.19K | 131.07KBest |
| Average output | 115 tokens | 1.1K tokens |
| Pricing, USD per 1M tokens | ||
| Input | $0.20 | $0.09Best |
| Output | $0.20Best | $0.30 |
| Cache read | — | $0.05 |
| Performance | ||
| Throughput | — | 31.8 tok/s |
| Time to first token | — | 4.4 s |
| Request success (24h) | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Benchmark indexes | ||
| Intelligence Index | 4.8 | 16.7Best |
| Coding Index | 2.7 | 39.3Best |
| Math Index | 12.7 | — |
| Capabilities | ||
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tools | No | Yes |
| Vision | No | Yes |
| Structured output | No | Yes |
| PDF input | Yes | No |
| Video input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning effort | — | — |
Public evaluations
Benchmarks
Independent evaluation results, with how each score ranks among the models in the Noumen catalog.
- Gemma 3 4B IT
- Gemma 4 26B A4B Thinking
Intelligence Index
- Gemma 3 4B IT4.8
- Gemma 4 26B A4B Thinking16.7
Gemma 3 4B IT: Better than 0% of 326 scored models
Indexes
Coding Index
Composite of the coding evaluations
- Gemma 3 4B IT: 2.7
- Gemma 4 26B A4B Thinking: 39.3Top
Math Index
Composite of the math evaluations
- Gemma 3 4B IT: 12.7
- Gemma 4 26B A4B Thinking: —
Agentic work
AutomationBench-AA
Workflow automation, penalized for guardrail violations
- Gemma 3 4B IT: —
- Gemma 4 26B A4B Thinking: 1.9%
AutomationBench-AA tasks completed
Workflows finished end to end without a guardrail violation
- Gemma 3 4B IT: —
- Gemma 4 26B A4B Thinking: 0.2%
AA-Briefcasev1.1
Agentic knowledge work, rated head to head
- Gemma 3 4B IT: —
- Gemma 4 26B A4B Thinking: 315 Elo
GDPval-AAv2.1
Economically valuable occupational tasks, rated head to head
- Gemma 3 4B IT: —
- Gemma 4 26B A4B Thinking: 565 Elo
Document reasoning
AA-LCRv1.1
Reasoning across long documents
- Gemma 3 4B IT: 6.7%
- Gemma 4 26B A4B Thinking: 65.7%Top
Reasoning and knowledge
Humanity’s Last Exam
Expert-level questions across academic fields
- Gemma 3 4B IT: 5.3%
- Gemma 4 26B A4B Thinking: 19.3%Top
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level science questions
- Gemma 3 4B IT: 29.1%
- Gemma 4 26B A4B Thinking: 79.2%Top
MMLU-Pro
Multi-subject knowledge and reasoning
- Gemma 3 4B IT: 41.7%
- Gemma 4 26B A4B Thinking: —
IFBench
Following precise output instructions
- Gemma 3 4B IT: 28.3%
- Gemma 4 26B A4B Thinking: 72.4%Top
Coding
SciCode
Scientific computing in Python
- Gemma 3 4B IT: —
- Gemma 4 26B A4B Thinking: 40.0%
LiveCodeBench
Recent competitive programming problems
- Gemma 3 4B IT: 11.2%
- Gemma 4 26B A4B Thinking: —
Math
AIME 2025
Competition mathematics, 2025 problems
- Gemma 3 4B IT: 12.7%
- Gemma 4 26B A4B Thinking: —
AIME
Competition mathematics
- Gemma 3 4B IT: 6.3%
- Gemma 4 26B A4B Thinking: —
MATH-500
Competition math problems
- Gemma 3 4B IT: 76.6%
- Gemma 4 26B A4B Thinking: —
Legacy evaluations
Terminal-Bench Hard
Earlier terminal task suite
- Gemma 3 4B IT: 0.8%
- Gemma 4 26B A4B Thinking: 13.6%Top
τ²-Bench Telecom
Tool use in a customer-support simulation
- Gemma 3 4B IT: 5.0%
- Gemma 4 26B A4B Thinking: 43.6%Top
AA-LCR (unversioned)
Long-context reasoning, earlier grading
- Gemma 3 4B IT: 6.7%
- Gemma 4 26B A4B Thinking: 65.7%Top
Scores from Artificial Analysis, updated Oct 26, 2026. Artificial Analysis
Live routing data
Performance and reliability
Recent averages across requests routed for this model. Your own speed depends on prompt length, reasoning effort and load.
- Request success (24h)
- 100.0%
- Reliable
- Healthy (98% or more)
- Degraded (90–98%)
- Down (under 90%)
- No requests
Developers
Use it through the API
Noumen’s API is OpenAI-compatible: any Chat Completions client works with a base URL and a key.
curl https://www.noumen.xyz/api/v1/chat/completions \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $NOUMEN_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"model": "unsloth/gemma-3-4b-it",
"messages": [{ "role": "user", "content": "Explain this stack trace." }]
}'import os
from openai import OpenAI
client = OpenAI(base_url="https://www.noumen.xyz/api/v1", api_key=os.environ["NOUMEN_API_KEY"])
reply = client.chat.completions.create(
model="unsloth/gemma-3-4b-it",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Explain this stack trace."}],
)
print(reply.choices[0].message.content)Related models
Other Google models, starting with the same family.