Google · Open weights
Gemma 4 26B A4B Thinking
Google's Gemma 4 26B A4B instruction-tuned model with structured reasoning for more deliberate coding, multimodal analysis, and long-context problem solving. Requests containing video cost $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens.
- Reasoning
- Tools
- Vision
- Structured output
- Video input
- Input
- Text, Images, Video
- Output
- Text
- Discovery tier
- Open weights
Pricing
USD per 1M tokens- Input
- $0.09
- Output
- $0.30
- Cache read
- $0.05
Reference prices as published by the model provider. API example
Specifications
- Context window
- 262.1K
- Max output
- 131.1K
- Average output (7 days)
- 1.1K tokens
- Longer than 72% of 465 models
Side by side
Compare models
Put Gemma 4 26B A4B Thinking next to up to three other models. The comparison stays in the link, so you can share it.
Public evaluations
Benchmarks
Independent evaluation results, with how each score ranks among the models in the Noumen catalog.
Intelligence Index
16.7
Better than 44% of 326 scored models
Indexes
Coding Index
39.3Composite of the coding evaluations
Better than 32% of 168 scored models
Agentic work
AutomationBench-AA
1.9%Workflow automation, penalized for guardrail violations
Better than 12% of 173 scored models
AutomationBench-AA tasks completed
0.2%Workflows finished end to end without a guardrail violation
Better than 13% of 173 scored models
AA-Briefcasev1.1
315 EloAgentic knowledge work, rated head to head
Better than 10% of 166 scored models
GDPval-AAv2.1
565 EloEconomically valuable occupational tasks, rated head to head
Better than 14% of 187 scored models
Document reasoning
AA-LCRv1.1
65.7%Reasoning across long documents
Better than 42% of 309 scored models
Reasoning and knowledge
Humanity’s Last Exam
19.3%Expert-level questions across academic fields
Better than 46% of 323 scored models
GPQA Diamond
79.2%Graduate-level science questions
Better than 46% of 291 scored models
IFBench
72.4%Following precise output instructions
Better than 79% of 215 scored models
Coding
SciCode
40.0%Scientific computing in Python
Better than 21% of 174 scored models
Legacy evaluations
Terminal-Bench Hard
13.6%Earlier terminal task suite
Better than 30% of 212 scored models
τ²-Bench Telecom
43.6%Tool use in a customer-support simulation
Better than 35% of 214 scored models
AA-LCR (unversioned)
65.7%Long-context reasoning, earlier grading
Better than 42% of 309 scored models
Scores from Artificial Analysis, updated Oct 26, 2026. Artificial Analysis
Live routing data
Performance and reliability
Recent averages across requests routed for this model. Your own speed depends on prompt length, reasoning effort and load.
- Throughput
- 58.6 tok/s
- Faster than 41% of 250 models
- Time to first token
- 3.1 s
- Quicker than 56% of 250 models
- Prompt cache hits
- 0.5%
- About $0.0898 per 1M input tokens with caching
- Request success (24h)
- 100.0%
- Reliable
Cache hits are the share of input tokens recently served from a prompt cache across all requests. They are not a forecast of your own hit rate.
- Healthy (98% or more)
- Degraded (90–98%)
- Down (under 90%)
- No requests
Developers
Use it through the API
Noumen’s API is OpenAI-compatible: any Chat Completions client works with a base URL and a key.
curl https://www.noumen.xyz/api/v1/chat/completions \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $NOUMEN_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"model": "google/gemma-4-26b-a4b-it:thinking",
"messages": [{ "role": "user", "content": "Explain this stack trace." }]
}'import os
from openai import OpenAI
client = OpenAI(base_url="https://www.noumen.xyz/api/v1", api_key=os.environ["NOUMEN_API_KEY"])
reply = client.chat.completions.create(
model="google/gemma-4-26b-a4b-it:thinking",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Explain this stack trace."}],
)
print(reply.choices[0].message.content)Related models
Other Google models, starting with the same family.