Mistral · Open weights
Mistral Small 4 119B Thinking
Mistral Small 4 with reasoning enabled (reasoning_effort=high). A hybrid MoE model with deep step-by-step reasoning for complex prompts, coding, and multi-step problem solving.
- Reasoning
- Tools
- Vision
- Structured output
- Input
- Text, Images
- Output
- Text
- Reasoning effort
- none · high
- Discovery tier
- Open weights
Pricing
USD per 1M tokens- Input
- $0.40
- Output
- $1.40
Reference prices as published by the model provider. API example
Specifications
- Context window
- 262.1K
- Max output
- 16.4K
- Average output (7 days)
- 997 tokens
- Longer than 70% of 465 models
Side by side
Mistral Small 4 119B Thinking compared
Specifications, prices, speed and benchmark scores next to each other. Benchmarks below show every compared model too.
| Mistral Small 4 119B ThinkingMistralThis model | Granite 4.2 8BibmRemove | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral | ibm |
| Discovery tier | Open weights | Open weights |
| Added | Mar 17, 2026 | Aug 31, 2026 |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 262.14KBest | 131.07K |
| Max output | 16.38K | — |
| Average output | 997 tokens | 2.4K tokens |
| Pricing, USD per 1M tokens | ||
| Input | $0.40 | $0.10Best |
| Output | $1.40 | $0.15Best |
| Cache read | — | $0.05 |
| Performance | ||
| Throughput | 123.6 tok/s | — |
| Time to first token | 1.7 s | — |
| Request success (24h) | 95.9% | 100.0%Best |
| Benchmark indexes | ||
| Intelligence Index | 11.3Best | 11.1 |
| Coding Index | 26.6Best | 22.4 |
| Capabilities | ||
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | Yes | Yes |
| Vision | Yes | No |
| Structured output | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning effort | none, high | none, low, high |
Public evaluations
Benchmarks
Independent evaluation results, with how each score ranks among the models in the Noumen catalog.
- Mistral Small 4 119B Thinking
- Granite 4.2 8B
Intelligence Index
- Mistral Small 4 119B Thinking11.3
- Granite 4.2 8B11.1
Mistral Small 4 119B Thinking: Better than 25% of 326 scored models
Indexes
Coding Index
Composite of the coding evaluations
- Mistral Small 4 119B Thinking: 26.6Top
- Granite 4.2 8B: 22.4
Agentic work
AutomationBench-AA
Workflow automation, penalized for guardrail violations
- Mistral Small 4 119B Thinking: 1.0%
- Granite 4.2 8B: 2.1%Top
AutomationBench-AA tasks completed
Workflows finished end to end without a guardrail violation
- Mistral Small 4 119B Thinking: 0.0%
- Granite 4.2 8B: 0.3%Top
AA-Briefcasev1.1
Agentic knowledge work, rated head to head
- Mistral Small 4 119B Thinking: 241 Elo
- Granite 4.2 8B: 310 EloTop
GDPval-AAv2.1
Economically valuable occupational tasks, rated head to head
- Mistral Small 4 119B Thinking: 362 Elo
- Granite 4.2 8B: 491 EloTop
Document reasoning
GDP.pdf
Professional reasoning over PDF documents, all-pass rate
- Mistral Small 4 119B Thinking: 0.0%
- Granite 4.2 8B: 0.6%Top
AA-LCRv1.1
Reasoning across long documents
- Mistral Small 4 119B Thinking: 49.7%Top
- Granite 4.2 8B: 45.0%
MLCR-AA
Long-context reasoning over medical records
- Mistral Small 4 119B Thinking: 1.7%
- Granite 4.2 8B: —
Reasoning and knowledge
Humanity’s Last Exam
Expert-level questions across academic fields
- Mistral Small 4 119B Thinking: 9.9%Top
- Granite 4.2 8B: 9.7%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level science questions
- Mistral Small 4 119B Thinking: 76.9%Top
- Granite 4.2 8B: 63.1%
IFBench
Following precise output instructions
- Mistral Small 4 119B Thinking: 48.2%
- Granite 4.2 8B: —
Coding
Terminal-Benchv4.0
Practical software engineering in a terminal
- Mistral Small 4 119B Thinking: 0.0%Top
- Granite 4.2 8B: 0.0%Top
SciCode
Scientific computing in Python
- Mistral Small 4 119B Thinking: 38.8%Top
- Granite 4.2 8B: 31.5%
Legacy evaluations
Terminal-Bench Hard
Earlier terminal task suite
- Mistral Small 4 119B Thinking: 17.4%
- Granite 4.2 8B: —
τ²-Bench Telecom
Tool use in a customer-support simulation
- Mistral Small 4 119B Thinking: 41.2%
- Granite 4.2 8B: —
AA-LCR (unversioned)
Long-context reasoning, earlier grading
- Mistral Small 4 119B Thinking: 49.7%Top
- Granite 4.2 8B: 45.0%
Scores from Artificial Analysis, updated Oct 26, 2026. Artificial Analysis
Live routing data
Performance and reliability
Recent averages across requests routed for this model. Your own speed depends on prompt length, reasoning effort and load.
- Throughput
- 123.6 tok/s
- Faster than 70% of 251 models
- Time to first token
- 1.7 s
- Quicker than 83% of 251 models
- Prompt cache hits
- 23.6%
- Request success (24h)
- 95.9%
- Reliable
Cache hits are the share of input tokens recently served from a prompt cache across all requests. They are not a forecast of your own hit rate.
- Healthy (98% or more)
- Degraded (90–98%)
- Down (under 90%)
- No requests
Developers
Use it through the API
Noumen’s API is OpenAI-compatible: any Chat Completions client works with a base URL and a key.
curl https://www.noumen.xyz/api/v1/chat/completions \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $NOUMEN_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"model": "mistralai/mistral-small-4-119b-2603:thinking",
"reasoning_effort": "none",
"messages": [{ "role": "user", "content": "Explain this stack trace." }]
}'import os
from openai import OpenAI
client = OpenAI(base_url="https://www.noumen.xyz/api/v1", api_key=os.environ["NOUMEN_API_KEY"])
reply = client.chat.completions.create(
model="mistralai/mistral-small-4-119b-2603:thinking",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Explain this stack trace."}],
)
print(reply.choices[0].message.content)Mistral
Related models
Other Mistral models, starting with the same family.