Mistral · Open weights
Mistral Small 4 119B Thinking
Mistral Small 4 with reasoning enabled (reasoning_effort=high). A hybrid MoE model with deep step-by-step reasoning for complex prompts, coding, and multi-step problem solving.
- Reasoning
- Tools
- Vision
- Structured output
- Input
- Text, Images
- Output
- Text
- Reasoning effort
- none · high
- Discovery tier
- Open weights
Pricing
USD per 1M tokens- Input
- $0.40
- Output
- $1.40
Reference prices as published by the model provider. API example
Specifications
- Context window
- 262.1K
- Max output
- 16.4K
- Average output (7 days)
- 997 tokens
- Longer than 70% of 465 models
Side by side
Compare models
Put Mistral Small 4 119B Thinking next to up to three other models. The comparison stays in the link, so you can share it.
Public evaluations
Benchmarks
Independent evaluation results, with how each score ranks among the models in the Noumen catalog.
Intelligence Index
11.3
Better than 25% of 326 scored models
Indexes
Coding Index
26.6Composite of the coding evaluations
Better than 19% of 168 scored models
Agentic work
AutomationBench-AA
1.0%Workflow automation, penalized for guardrail violations
Better than 10% of 173 scored models
AutomationBench-AA tasks completed
0.0%Workflows finished end to end without a guardrail violation
Better than 0% of 173 scored models
AA-Briefcasev1.1
241 EloAgentic knowledge work, rated head to head
Better than 4% of 166 scored models
GDPval-AAv2.1
362 EloEconomically valuable occupational tasks, rated head to head
Better than 6% of 187 scored models
Document reasoning
GDP.pdf
0.0%Professional reasoning over PDF documents, all-pass rate
Better than 0% of 171 scored models
AA-LCRv1.1
49.7%Reasoning across long documents
Better than 27% of 309 scored models
MLCR-AA
1.7%Long-context reasoning over medical records
Better than 3% of 121 scored models
Reasoning and knowledge
Humanity’s Last Exam
9.9%Expert-level questions across academic fields
Better than 31% of 323 scored models
GPQA Diamond
76.9%Graduate-level science questions
Better than 40% of 291 scored models
IFBench
48.2%Following precise output instructions
Better than 44% of 215 scored models
Coding
Terminal-Benchv4.0
0.0%Practical software engineering in a terminal
Better than 0% of 171 scored models
SciCode
38.8%Scientific computing in Python
Better than 18% of 174 scored models
Legacy evaluations
Terminal-Bench Hard
17.4%Earlier terminal task suite
Better than 35% of 212 scored models
τ²-Bench Telecom
41.2%Tool use in a customer-support simulation
Better than 33% of 214 scored models
AA-LCR (unversioned)
49.7%Long-context reasoning, earlier grading
Better than 27% of 309 scored models
Scores from Artificial Analysis, updated Oct 26, 2026. Artificial Analysis
Live routing data
Performance and reliability
Recent averages across requests routed for this model. Your own speed depends on prompt length, reasoning effort and load.
- Throughput
- 133.7 tok/s
- Faster than 74% of 251 models
- Time to first token
- 0.8 s
- Quicker than 98% of 251 models
- Prompt cache hits
- 59.1%
- Request success (24h)
- 94.3%
Cache hits are the share of input tokens recently served from a prompt cache across all requests. They are not a forecast of your own hit rate.
Developers
Use it through the API
Noumen’s API is OpenAI-compatible: any Chat Completions client works with a base URL and a key.
curl https://www.noumen.xyz/api/v1/chat/completions \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $NOUMEN_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"model": "mistralai/mistral-small-4-119b-2603:thinking",
"reasoning_effort": "none",
"messages": [{ "role": "user", "content": "Explain this stack trace." }]
}'import os
from openai import OpenAI
client = OpenAI(base_url="https://www.noumen.xyz/api/v1", api_key=os.environ["NOUMEN_API_KEY"])
reply = client.chat.completions.create(
model="mistralai/mistral-small-4-119b-2603:thinking",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Explain this stack trace."}],
)
print(reply.choices[0].message.content)Mistral
Related models
Other Mistral models, starting with the same family.