Google · Open weights
Gemma 4 31B
Google's Gemma 4 31B instruction-tuned model for heavier reasoning, coding, agentic workflows, and long-context multimodal understanding. This route keeps tokenizer thinking disabled for faster direct answers. Requests containing video cost $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens.
- Reasoning
- Tools
- Vision
- Structured output
- Video input
- Input
- Text, Images, Video
- Output
- Text
- Discovery tier
- Open weights
Pricing
USD per 1M tokens- Input
- $0.14
- Output
- $0.40
- Cache read
- $0.05
Reference prices as published by the model provider. API example
Specifications
- Context window
- 262.1K
- Max output
- 131.1K
- Average output (7 days)
- 338 tokens
- Longer than 36% of 468 models
Side by side
Gemma 4 31B compared
Specifications, prices, speed and benchmark scores next to each other. Benchmarks below show every compared model too.
| Gemma 4 31BGoogleThis model | Gemma 4 31B IT TEEGoogleRemove | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Discovery tier | Open weights | Open weights |
| Added | Apr 2, 2026 | May 26, 2026 |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 262.14K | 262.14K |
| Max output | 131.07K | 262.14KBest |
| Average output | 338 tokens | 269 tokens |
| Pricing, USD per 1M tokens | ||
| Input | $0.14Best | $0.15 |
| Output | $0.40Best | $0.46 |
| Cache read | $0.05 | — |
| Performance | ||
| Throughput | 39.3 tok/s | 53.0 tok/sBest |
| Time to first token | 3.2 sBest | 5.4 s |
| Request success (24h) | 99.7% | 99.8%Best |
| Benchmark indexes | ||
| Intelligence Index | 14.7 | 14.7 |
| Coding Index | 43.4 | 43.4 |
| Capabilities | ||
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | Yes | Yes |
| Vision | Yes | No |
| Structured output | Yes | No |
| Video input | Yes | No |
| Reasoning effort | — | — |
Public evaluations
Benchmarks
Independent evaluation results, with how each score ranks among the models in the Noumen catalog.
- Gemma 4 31B
- Gemma 4 31B IT TEE
Intelligence Index
- Gemma 4 31B14.7
- Gemma 4 31B IT TEE14.7
Gemma 4 31B: Better than 35% of 326 scored models
Indexes
Coding Index
Composite of the coding evaluations
- Gemma 4 31B: 43.4Top
- Gemma 4 31B IT TEE: 43.4Top
Agentic work
AutomationBench-AA
Workflow automation, penalized for guardrail violations
- Gemma 4 31B: 4.9%Top
- Gemma 4 31B IT TEE: 4.9%Top
AutomationBench-AA tasks completed
Workflows finished end to end without a guardrail violation
- Gemma 4 31B: 0.5%Top
- Gemma 4 31B IT TEE: 0.5%Top
AA-Briefcasev1.1
Agentic knowledge work, rated head to head
- Gemma 4 31B: 368 EloTop
- Gemma 4 31B IT TEE: 368 EloTop
GDPval-AAv2.1
Economically valuable occupational tasks, rated head to head
- Gemma 4 31B: 619 EloTop
- Gemma 4 31B IT TEE: 619 EloTop
Document reasoning
GDP.pdf
Professional reasoning over PDF documents, all-pass rate
- Gemma 4 31B: 6.0%Top
- Gemma 4 31B IT TEE: 6.0%Top
AA-LCRv1.1
Reasoning across long documents
- Gemma 4 31B: 69.7%Top
- Gemma 4 31B IT TEE: 69.7%Top
Reasoning and knowledge
Humanity’s Last Exam
Expert-level questions across academic fields
- Gemma 4 31B: 23.6%Top
- Gemma 4 31B IT TEE: 23.6%Top
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level science questions
- Gemma 4 31B: 85.7%Top
- Gemma 4 31B IT TEE: 85.7%Top
IFBench
Following precise output instructions
- Gemma 4 31B: 75.6%Top
- Gemma 4 31B IT TEE: 75.6%Top
Coding
Terminal-Benchv4.0
Practical software engineering in a terminal
- Gemma 4 31B: 0.0%Top
- Gemma 4 31B IT TEE: 0.0%Top
SciCode
Scientific computing in Python
- Gemma 4 31B: 45.5%Top
- Gemma 4 31B IT TEE: 45.5%Top
Legacy evaluations
Terminal-Bench Hard
Earlier terminal task suite
- Gemma 4 31B: 36.4%Top
- Gemma 4 31B IT TEE: 36.4%Top
τ²-Bench Telecom
Tool use in a customer-support simulation
- Gemma 4 31B: 59.9%Top
- Gemma 4 31B IT TEE: 59.9%Top
AA-LCR (unversioned)
Long-context reasoning, earlier grading
- Gemma 4 31B: 69.7%Top
- Gemma 4 31B IT TEE: 69.7%Top
Scores from Artificial Analysis, updated Oct 26, 2026. Artificial Analysis
Live routing data
Performance and reliability
Recent averages across requests routed for this model. Your own speed depends on prompt length, reasoning effort and load.
- Throughput
- 39.3 tok/s
- Faster than 27% of 253 models
- Time to first token
- 3.2 s
- Quicker than 55% of 253 models
- Prompt cache hits
- 15.1%
- About $0.13 per 1M input tokens with caching
- Request success (24h)
- 99.7%
- Reliable
Cache hits are the share of input tokens recently served from a prompt cache across all requests. They are not a forecast of your own hit rate.
- Healthy (98% or more)
- Degraded (90–98%)
- Down (under 90%)
- No requests
Developers
Use it through the API
Noumen’s API is OpenAI-compatible: any Chat Completions client works with a base URL and a key.
curl https://www.noumen.xyz/api/v1/chat/completions \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $NOUMEN_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"model": "google/gemma-4-31b-it",
"messages": [{ "role": "user", "content": "Explain this stack trace." }]
}'import os
from openai import OpenAI
client = OpenAI(base_url="https://www.noumen.xyz/api/v1", api_key=os.environ["NOUMEN_API_KEY"])
reply = client.chat.completions.create(
model="google/gemma-4-31b-it",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Explain this stack trace."}],
)
print(reply.choices[0].message.content)Related models
Other Google models, starting with the same family.