Google · Efficient
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google's speed-focused Gemini Flash model for frontier multimodal intelligence across text, images, audio, video, PDFs, and code. Built for agentic coding, reliable tool use, structured outputs, and long-context workflows. Audio input costs $3.00 per million audio tokens.
- Reasoning
- Tools
- Vision
- Structured output
- Audio input
- Video input
- Input
- Text, Images, Video, Audio
- Output
- Text
- Reasoning effort
- minimal · low · medium · high
- Discovery tier
- Efficient
Pricing
USD per 1M tokens- Input
- $1.50
- Output
- $9.00
- Cache read
- $0.15
- Cache write
- $0.0833
Reference prices as published by the model provider. API example
Specifications
- Context window
- 1M
- Max output
- 65.5K
- Average output (7 days)
- 322 tokens
- Longer than 35% of 465 models
Side by side
Gemini 3.5 Flash compared
Specifications, prices, speed and benchmark scores next to each other. Benchmarks below show every compared model too.
| Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogleThis model | Gemini 3 Flash (Preview)GoogleRemove | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Discovery tier | Efficient | Efficient |
| Added | May 19, 2026 | Dec 17, 2025 |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 1.05M | 1.05M |
| Max output | 65.54K | 65.54K |
| Average output | 322 tokens | 592 tokens |
| Pricing, USD per 1M tokens | ||
| Input | $1.50 | $0.50Best |
| Output | $9.00 | $3.00Best |
| Cache read | $0.15 | $0.05Best |
| Cache write | $0.0833 | — |
| Performance | ||
| Throughput | 264.0 tok/sBest | 211.2 tok/s |
| Time to first token | 4.8 s | 1.3 sBest |
| Request success (24h) | 98.1% | 99.8%Best |
| Benchmark indexes | ||
| Intelligence Index | 32.6Best | 17.9 |
| Coding Index | 70.1 | — |
| Math Index | — | 55.7 |
| Capabilities | ||
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | Yes | Yes |
| Vision | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | Yes |
| Audio input | Yes | Yes |
| Video input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning effort | minimal, low, medium, high | minimal, low, medium, high |
Public evaluations
Benchmarks
Independent evaluation results, with how each score ranks among the models in the Noumen catalog.
- Gemini 3.5 Flash
- Gemini 3 Flash (Preview)
Intelligence Index
- Gemini 3.5 Flash32.6
- Gemini 3 Flash (Preview)17.9
Gemini 3.5 Flash tested at high reasoning effort
Gemini 3.5 Flash: Better than 76% of 326 scored models
Indexes
Coding Index
Composite of the coding evaluations
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 70.1
- Gemini 3 Flash (Preview): —
Math Index
Composite of the math evaluations
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: —
- Gemini 3 Flash (Preview): 55.7
Agentic work
AutomationBench-AA
Workflow automation, penalized for guardrail violations
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 42.1%
- Gemini 3 Flash (Preview): —
AutomationBench-AA tasks completed
Workflows finished end to end without a guardrail violation
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 13.5%
- Gemini 3 Flash (Preview): —
AA-Briefcasev1.1
Agentic knowledge work, rated head to head
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 874 Elo
- Gemini 3 Flash (Preview): —
GDPval-AAv2.1
Economically valuable occupational tasks, rated head to head
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 1,202 Elo
- Gemini 3 Flash (Preview): —
Document reasoning
GDP.pdf
Professional reasoning over PDF documents, all-pass rate
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 19.8%
- Gemini 3 Flash (Preview): —
AA-LCRv1.1
Reasoning across long documents
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 73.3%Top
- Gemini 3 Flash (Preview): 55.3%
MLCR-AA
Long-context reasoning over medical records
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 10.0%
- Gemini 3 Flash (Preview): —
Reasoning and knowledge
Humanity’s Last Exam
Expert-level questions across academic fields
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 42.7%Top
- Gemini 3 Flash (Preview): 15.0%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level science questions
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 92.2%Top
- Gemini 3 Flash (Preview): 81.2%
MMLU-Pro
Multi-subject knowledge and reasoning
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: —
- Gemini 3 Flash (Preview): 88.2%
IFBench
Following precise output instructions
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 76.3%Top
- Gemini 3 Flash (Preview): 55.1%
Coding
Terminal-Benchv4.0
Practical software engineering in a terminal
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 6.6%
- Gemini 3 Flash (Preview): —
SciCode
Scientific computing in Python
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 53.9%
- Gemini 3 Flash (Preview): —
LiveCodeBench
Recent competitive programming problems
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: —
- Gemini 3 Flash (Preview): 79.7%
Math
AIME 2025
Competition mathematics, 2025 problems
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: —
- Gemini 3 Flash (Preview): 55.7%
Legacy evaluations
Terminal-Bench Hard
Earlier terminal task suite
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 40.9%Top
- Gemini 3 Flash (Preview): 31.8%
τ²-Bench Telecom
Tool use in a customer-support simulation
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 95.3%Top
- Gemini 3 Flash (Preview): 43.3%
AA-LCR (unversioned)
Long-context reasoning, earlier grading
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 73.3%Top
- Gemini 3 Flash (Preview): 55.3%
Scores from Artificial Analysis, updated Oct 26, 2026. Gemini 3.5 Flash was tested at high reasoning effort; compare scores measured at the same effort.Artificial Analysis
- Gemini 3.5 Flash
- Gemini 3 Flash (Preview)
| Leaderboard | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Gemini 3 Flash (Preview) |
|---|---|---|
| Math | #18 · 2.0% | Not in top 20 |
Ranks among Noumen catalog models on Use cases leaderboards. Only top-20 placements are listed.
- Gemini 3.5 Flash
- Gemini 3 Flash (Preview)
| Leaderboard | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Gemini 3 Flash (Preview) |
|---|---|---|
| Math | #18 · 1497.4 | Not in top 20 |
| Creative Writing | #15 · 1468.5 | Not in top 20 |
| German | #15 · 1491.8 | #10 · 1499.1 |
| Industry Writing And Literature And Language | #17 · 1473.7 | Not in top 20 |
| Japanese | #15 · 1479.0 | #13 · 1488.7 |
| Polish | #5 · 1506.1 | #10 · 1496.6 |
| Russian | #19 · 1491.1 | Not in top 20 |
| Vision Style Control · Chinese | #10 · 1346.4 | Not in top 20 |
| Vision Style Control · Creative Writing Vision | #15 · 1277.1 | #6 · 1296.1 |
| Vision Style Control · Diagram | #17 · 1312.7 | Not in top 20 |
| Vision Style Control · English | #17 · 1278.2 | Not in top 20 |
| Vision Style Control · Homework | #16 · 1316.2 | Not in top 20 |
| Vision Style Control · Humor | #5 · 1292.8 | #14 · 1268.8 |
| Vision Style Control · Ocr | #13 · 1299.1 | Not in top 20 |
| Document Overall | #16 · 1463.3 | Not in top 20 |
| Spanish | Not in top 20 | #17 · 1478.0 |
| Vision Style Control · Creative Writing | Not in top 20 | #2 · 1289.1 |
| Vision Style Control · Captioning | Not in top 20 | #6 · 1233.8 |
| Vision Style Control · Entity Recognition | Not in top 20 | #1 · 1290.0 |
Ranks among Noumen catalog models on LMArena leaderboards. Only top-20 placements are listed.LMArena
- Gemini 3.5 Flash
- Gemini 3 Flash (Preview)
| Leaderboard | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Gemini 3 Flash (Preview) |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | #20 · 72.1% | Not in top 20 |
Ranks among Noumen catalog models on ARC Prize leaderboards. Only top-20 placements are listed.ARC Prize
- Gemini 3.5 Flash
- Gemini 3 Flash (Preview)
| Leaderboard | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Gemini 3 Flash (Preview) |
|---|---|---|
| SVG | #15 · 1253 | Not in top 20 |
| ASCII Art | #16 · 1251 | Not in top 20 |
| Agentic Game Dev | #10 · 1145 | Not in top 20 |
| Full Stack | #17 · 1197 | Not in top 20 |
| Native Apps | #12 · 1186 | Not in top 20 |
Ranks among Noumen catalog models on Design Arena leaderboards. Only top-20 placements are listed.Design Arena
- Gemini 3.5 Flash
- Gemini 3 Flash (Preview)
| Leaderboard | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Gemini 3 Flash (Preview) |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1–3) | Not in top 20 | #11 · 51.2% |
| SWE-bench Verified | Not in top 20 | #7 · 75.4% |
Ranks among Noumen catalog models on Epoch AI leaderboards. Only top-20 placements are listed.Epoch AI
Live routing data
Performance and reliability
Recent averages across requests routed for this model. Your own speed depends on prompt length, reasoning effort and load.
- Throughput
- 264.0 tok/s
- Faster than 91% of 250 models
- Time to first token
- 4.8 s
- Quicker than 36% of 250 models
- Prompt cache hits
- 14.4%
- About $1.31 per 1M input tokens with caching
- Request success (24h)
- 98.1%
- Reliable
Cache hits are the share of input tokens recently served from a prompt cache across all requests. They are not a forecast of your own hit rate.
- Healthy (98% or more)
- Degraded (90–98%)
- Down (under 90%)
- No requests
Developers
Use it through the API
Noumen’s API is OpenAI-compatible: any Chat Completions client works with a base URL and a key.
curl https://www.noumen.xyz/api/v1/chat/completions \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $NOUMEN_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"model": "google/gemini-3.5-flash",
"reasoning_effort": "medium",
"messages": [{ "role": "user", "content": "Explain this stack trace." }]
}'import os
from openai import OpenAI
client = OpenAI(base_url="https://www.noumen.xyz/api/v1", api_key=os.environ["NOUMEN_API_KEY"])
reply = client.chat.completions.create(
model="google/gemini-3.5-flash",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Explain this stack trace."}],
)
print(reply.choices[0].message.content)Related models
Other Google models, starting with the same family.