Google · Efficient
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google's GA Flash model delivers near-Pro coding and agentic capability at Flash-tier speed and cost, with improved token efficiency over Gemini 3.5 Flash. It is optimized for multi-step orchestration, full-stack code refactoring, general reasoning, and multimodal workflows.
- Reasoning
- Tools
- Vision
- Structured output
- PDF input
- Audio input
- Video input
- Input
- Text, Images, Video, Audio
- Output
- Text
- Reasoning effort
- minimal · low · medium · high
- Discovery tier
- Efficient
Pricing
USD per 1M tokens- Input
- $0.75
- Output
- $3.75
- Cache read
- $0.075
- Cache write
- $0.0417
Reference prices as published by the model provider. API example
Specifications
- Context window
- 1M
- Max output
- 65.5K
- Average output (7 days)
- 932 tokens
- Longer than 69% of 473 models
Side by side
Compare models
Put Gemini 3.6 Flash next to up to three other models. The comparison stays in the link, so you can share it.
Public evaluations
Benchmarks
Independent evaluation results, with how each score ranks among the models in the Noumen catalog.
Intelligence Index
34.0
Tested at high reasoning effort
Better than 77% of 326 scored models
Indexes
Coding Index
69.2Composite of the coding evaluations
Better than 76% of 168 scored models
Agentic work
AutomationBench-AA
53.0%Workflow automation, penalized for guardrail violations
Better than 66% of 173 scored models
AutomationBench-AA tasks completed
16.4%Workflows finished end to end without a guardrail violation
Better than 62% of 173 scored models
AA-Briefcasev1.1
955 EloAgentic knowledge work, rated head to head
Better than 42% of 166 scored models
GDPval-AAv2.1
1,286 EloEconomically valuable occupational tasks, rated head to head
Better than 58% of 187 scored models
Document reasoning
GDP.pdf
17.4%Professional reasoning over PDF documents, all-pass rate
Better than 68% of 171 scored models
AA-LCRv1.1
80.0%Reasoning across long documents
Better than 80% of 309 scored models
MLCR-AA
10.0%Long-context reasoning over medical records
Better than 33% of 121 scored models
Reasoning and knowledge
Humanity’s Last Exam
40.8%Expert-level questions across academic fields
Better than 78% of 323 scored models
GPQA Diamond
92.8%Graduate-level science questions
Better than 89% of 291 scored models
Coding
Terminal-Benchv4.0
7.1%Practical software engineering in a terminal
Better than 58% of 171 scored models
SciCode
53.4%Scientific computing in Python
Better than 63% of 174 scored models
Legacy evaluations
AA-LCR (unversioned)
80.0%Long-context reasoning, earlier grading
Better than 80% of 309 scored models
Scores from Artificial Analysis, updated Oct 26, 2026. Gemini 3.6 Flash was tested at high reasoning effort; compare scores measured at the same effort.Artificial Analysis
- #11Math11.0%
Ranks among Noumen catalog models on Use cases leaderboards. Only top-20 placements are listed.
- #17Overall1483.0
- #11Math1503.8
- #12Creative Writing1471.4
- #17Chinese1530.4
- #17Exclude Ties1495.5
- #8French1513.1
- #14Industry Entertainment And Sports And Media1460.9
- #15Industry Writing And Literature And Language1473.9
- #16Japanese1476.4
- #18Russian1492.8
- #14Vision Style Control · Chinese1334.6
- #15Vision Style Control · Humor1268.4
- #11Vision Style Control · Ocr1300.7
- #18Document Overall1456.1
Ranks among Noumen catalog models on LMArena leaderboards. Only top-20 placements are listed.LMArena
- #18Website1300
- #18UI Component1292
- #18Data Visualization1289
- #8ASCII Art1277
- #11Agentic Game Dev1143
- #9Native Apps1205
- #16Mobile Apps1197
Ranks among Noumen catalog models on Design Arena leaderboards. Only top-20 placements are listed.Design Arena
Live routing data
Performance and reliability
Recent averages across requests routed for this model. Your own speed depends on prompt length, reasoning effort and load.
- Throughput
- 189.5 tok/s
- Faster than 83% of 256 models
- Time to first token
- 7.5 s
- Quicker than 15% of 256 models
- Prompt cache hits
- 29.7%
- About $0.55 per 1M input tokens with caching
- Request success (24h)
- 99.4%
- Reliable
Cache hits are the share of input tokens recently served from a prompt cache across all requests. They are not a forecast of your own hit rate.
- Healthy (98% or more)
- Degraded (90–98%)
- Down (under 90%)
- No requests
Developers
Use it through the API
Noumen’s API is OpenAI-compatible: any Chat Completions client works with a base URL and a key.
curl https://www.noumen.xyz/api/v1/chat/completions \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $NOUMEN_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"model": "google/gemini-3.6-flash",
"reasoning_effort": "medium",
"messages": [{ "role": "user", "content": "Explain this stack trace." }]
}'import os
from openai import OpenAI
client = OpenAI(base_url="https://www.noumen.xyz/api/v1", api_key=os.environ["NOUMEN_API_KEY"])
reply = client.chat.completions.create(
model="google/gemini-3.6-flash",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Explain this stack trace."}],
)
print(reply.choices[0].message.content)Related models
Other Google models, starting with the same family.