NOUMENOpen app

Google · Efficient

Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (09/2025)

Added Sep 25, 2025

Compare models

Choose up to 3 models to compare.1 of 3 chosen

Loading models…

Use in the app

State-of-the-art Gemini 2.5 Flash checkpoint tuned for advanced reasoning, coding, math, and scientific tasks. Built-in thinking for higher accuracy and nuanced context handling. Routed to Gemini 2.5 Flash (stable).

  • Reasoning
  • Tools
  • Vision
  • Structured output
  • PDF input
  • Audio input
Input
Text, Images, Audio
Output
Text
Reasoning effort
low · medium · high
Discovery tier
Efficient

Pricing

USD per 1M tokens
Input
$0.30
Output
$2.50
Cache read
$0.03

Reference prices as published by the model provider. API example

Specifications

Context window
1M
Max output
65.5K

Side by side

Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (09/2025) compared

Specifications, prices, speed and benchmark scores next to each other. Benchmarks below show every compared model too.

Compare models

Choose up to 3 models to compare.1 of 3 chosen

Loading models…

Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (09/2025)GoogleThis modelKimi K2 0711 FastMoonshotRemove
ProviderGoogleMoonshot
Discovery tierEfficientOpen weights
AddedSep 25, 2025Dec 15, 2025
Limits
Context window1.05MBest131.07K
Max output65.54KBest16.38K
Pricing, USD per 1M tokens
Input$0.30Best$0.40
Output$2.50$1.80Best
Cache read$0.03—
Performance
Request success (24h)99.7%—
Benchmark indexes
Intelligence Index12.412.7Best
Math Index56.757.0Best
Capabilities
ReasoningYesNo
ToolsYesNo
VisionYesNo
Structured outputYesNo
PDF inputYesYes
Audio inputYesNo
Reasoning effortlow, medium, high—

Public evaluations

Benchmarks

Independent evaluation results, with how each score ranks among the models in the Noumen catalog.

  • Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (09/2025)
  • Kimi K2 0711 Fast

Intelligence Index

  • Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (09/2025)12.4
  • Kimi K2 0711 Fast12.7

Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (09/2025): Better than 26% of 326 scored models

3.8Catalog models by score55.1

Indexes

  • Math Index

    Composite of the math evaluations

    • Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (09/2025): 56.7
    • Kimi K2 0711 Fast: 57.0Top

Document reasoning

  • AA-LCRv1.1

    Reasoning across long documents

    • Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (09/2025): 60.0%Top
    • Kimi K2 0711 Fast: 53.0%

Reasoning and knowledge

  • Humanity’s Last Exam

    Expert-level questions across academic fields

    • Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (09/2025): 8.7%Top
    • Kimi K2 0711 Fast: 7.4%
  • GPQA Diamond

    Graduate-level science questions

    • Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (09/2025): 76.6%Top
    • Kimi K2 0711 Fast: 76.6%Top
  • MMLU-Pro

    Multi-subject knowledge and reasoning

    • Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (09/2025): 83.6%Top
    • Kimi K2 0711 Fast: 82.4%
  • IFBench

    Following precise output instructions

    • Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (09/2025): 43.5%Top
    • Kimi K2 0711 Fast: 41.5%

Coding

  • LiveCodeBench

    Recent competitive programming problems

    • Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (09/2025): 62.5%Top
    • Kimi K2 0711 Fast: 55.6%

Math

  • AIME 2025

    Competition mathematics, 2025 problems

    • Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (09/2025): 56.7%
    • Kimi K2 0711 Fast: 57.0%Top
  • AIME

    Competition mathematics

    • Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (09/2025): —
    • Kimi K2 0711 Fast: 69.3%
  • MATH-500

    Competition math problems

    • Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (09/2025): —
    • Kimi K2 0711 Fast: 97.1%

Legacy evaluations

  • Terminal-Bench Hard

    Earlier terminal task suite

    • Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (09/2025): 14.4%
    • Kimi K2 0711 Fast: 15.9%Top
  • τ²-Bench Telecom

    Tool use in a customer-support simulation

    • Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (09/2025): 28.4%
    • Kimi K2 0711 Fast: 61.1%Top
  • AA-LCR (unversioned)

    Long-context reasoning, earlier grading

    • Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (09/2025): 60.0%Top
    • Kimi K2 0711 Fast: 53.0%

Scores from Artificial Analysis, updated Oct 26, 2026. Artificial Analysis

Live routing data

Performance and reliability

Recent averages across requests routed for this model. Your own speed depends on prompt length, reasoning effort and load.

Prompt cache hits
45.3%
About $0.18 per 1M input tokens with caching
Request success (24h)
99.7%
Reliable

Cache hits are the share of input tokens recently served from a prompt cache across all requests. They are not a forecast of your own hit rate.

Hourly request success · last 72 hoursLowest hour 80.0%
  • Healthy (98% or more)
  • Degraded (90–98%)
  • Down (under 90%)
  • No requests

Developers

Use it through the API

Noumen’s API is OpenAI-compatible: any Chat Completions client works with a base URL and a key.

Read the quickstart
curl https://www.noumen.xyz/api/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $NOUMEN_API_KEY" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "gemini-2.5-flash-preview-09-2025",
    "reasoning_effort": "medium",
    "messages": [{ "role": "user", "content": "Explain this stack trace." }]
  }'
import os
from openai import OpenAI

client = OpenAI(base_url="https://www.noumen.xyz/api/v1", api_key=os.environ["NOUMEN_API_KEY"])
reply = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="gemini-2.5-flash-preview-09-2025",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Explain this stack trace."}],
)
print(reply.choices[0].message.content)

Google

Other Google models, starting with the same family.