Google · Efficient
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (09/2025) – Thinking
Same checkpoint with thinking enabled by default for deeper reasoning and stepwise analysis on complex tasks. Routed to Gemini 2.5 Flash Thinking (stable).
- Reasoning
- Tools
- Vision
- Structured output
- PDF input
- Audio input
- Input
- Text, Images, Audio
- Output
- Text
- Reasoning effort
- low · medium · high
- Discovery tier
- Efficient
Pricing
USD per 1M tokens- Input
- $0.30
- Output
- $2.50
- Cache read
- $0.03
Reference prices as published by the model provider. API example
Specifications
- Context window
- 1M
- Max output
- 65.5K
Side by side
Compare models
Put Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (09/2025) – Thinking next to up to three other models. The comparison stays in the link, so you can share it.
Public evaluations
Benchmarks
Independent evaluation results, with how each score ranks among the models in the Noumen catalog.
Intelligence Index
15.5
Better than 39% of 326 scored models
Indexes
Math Index
78.3Composite of the math evaluations
Better than 72% of 118 scored models
Document reasoning
AA-LCRv1.1
71.0%Reasoning across long documents
Better than 52% of 309 scored models
Reasoning and knowledge
Humanity’s Last Exam
13.8%Expert-level questions across academic fields
Better than 40% of 323 scored models
GPQA Diamond
79.3%Graduate-level science questions
Better than 47% of 291 scored models
MMLU-Pro
84.2%Multi-subject knowledge and reasoning
Better than 84% of 132 scored models
IFBench
52.3%Following precise output instructions
Better than 52% of 215 scored models
Coding
LiveCodeBench
71.3%Recent competitive programming problems
Better than 72% of 129 scored models
Math
AIME 2025
78.3%Competition mathematics, 2025 problems
Better than 72% of 118 scored models
Legacy evaluations
Terminal-Bench Hard
16.7%Earlier terminal task suite
Better than 35% of 212 scored models
τ²-Bench Telecom
45.6%Tool use in a customer-support simulation
Better than 36% of 214 scored models
AA-LCR (unversioned)
71.0%Long-context reasoning, earlier grading
Better than 52% of 309 scored models
Scores from Artificial Analysis, updated Oct 26, 2026. Artificial Analysis
Live routing data
Performance and reliability
Recent averages across requests routed for this model. Your own speed depends on prompt length, reasoning effort and load.
- Request success (24h)
- 99.4%
- Reliable
- Healthy (98% or more)
- Degraded (90–98%)
- Down (under 90%)
- No requests
Developers
Use it through the API
Noumen’s API is OpenAI-compatible: any Chat Completions client works with a base URL and a key.
curl https://www.noumen.xyz/api/v1/chat/completions \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $NOUMEN_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"model": "gemini-2.5-flash-preview-09-2025-thinking",
"reasoning_effort": "medium",
"messages": [{ "role": "user", "content": "Explain this stack trace." }]
}'import os
from openai import OpenAI
client = OpenAI(base_url="https://www.noumen.xyz/api/v1", api_key=os.environ["NOUMEN_API_KEY"])
reply = client.chat.completions.create(
model="gemini-2.5-flash-preview-09-2025-thinking",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Explain this stack trace."}],
)
print(reply.choices[0].message.content)Related models
Other Google models, starting with the same family.