NOUMENOpen app
NOUMEN

DeepSeek · Open weights

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813

Added Aug 12, 2026Open weights

Compare models

Choose up to 3 models to compare.1 of 3 chosen

Loading models…

Use in the app

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is the general-availability release of DeepSeek V4 Pro, built for coding, tool use, cybersecurity, automation, and long-horizon agent workflows. DeepSeek reports strong gains over the preview and scores above Opus 4.8 on Terminal Bench 2.1, Cybergym, DeepSWE, and AutomationBench. It supports a 1M-token context window.

  • Reasoning
  • Tools
  • Structured output
Input
Text
Output
Text
Reasoning effort
none · low · high · max
Discovery tier
Open weights

Pricing

USD per 1M tokens
Input
$0.17
Output
$0.50
Cache read
$0.0053

Reference prices as published by the model provider. API example

Specifications

Context window
1M
Max output
384K
Average output (7 days)
788 tokens
Longer than 64% of 468 models

Side by side

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 compared

Specifications, prices, speed and benchmark scores next to each other. Benchmarks below show every compared model too.

Compare models

Choose up to 3 models to compare.1 of 3 chosen

Loading models…

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813DeepSeekThis modelGPT 5.6 LunaOpenAIRemove
ProviderDeepSeekOpenAI
Discovery tierOpen weightsEfficient
AddedAug 12, 2026Jul 9, 2026
Limits
Context window1.05M1.05MBest
Max output384KBest128K
Average output788 tokens281 tokens
Pricing, USD per 1M tokens
Input$0.17Best$0.20
Output$0.50Best$1.20
Cache read$0.0053Best$0.02
Cache write—$0.25
Performance
Throughput74.6 tok/s310.5 tok/sBest
Time to first token1.8 sBest4.9 s
Request success (24h)99.7%99.9%Best
Benchmark indexes
Intelligence Index36.037.3Best
Coding Index68.871.4Best
Capabilities
ReasoningYesYes
ToolsYesYes
VisionNoYes
Structured outputYesYes
PDF inputNoYes
Reasoning effortnone, low, high, maxnone, low, medium, high, xhigh, max

Public evaluations

Benchmarks

Independent evaluation results, with how each score ranks among the models in the Noumen catalog.

  • DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
  • GPT 5.6 Luna

Intelligence Index

  • DeepSeek V4 Pro 081336.0
  • GPT 5.6 Luna37.3

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 tested at max reasoning effort

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: Better than 79% of 326 scored models

3.8Catalog models by score55.1

Indexes

  • Coding Index

    Composite of the coding evaluations

    • DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: 68.8
    • GPT 5.6 Luna: 71.4Top

Agentic work

  • AutomationBench-AA

    Workflow automation, penalized for guardrail violations

    • DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: 56.7%Top
    • GPT 5.6 Luna: 50.2%

  • AutomationBench-AA tasks completed

    Workflows finished end to end without a guardrail violation

    • DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: 25.9%Top
    • GPT 5.6 Luna: 18.6%

  • AA-Briefcasev1.1

    Agentic knowledge work, rated head to head

    • DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: 1,256 Elo
    • GPT 5.6 Luna: 1,339 EloTop

  • GDPval-AAv2.1

    Economically valuable occupational tasks, rated head to head

    • DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: 1,449 Elo
    • GPT 5.6 Luna: 1,460 EloTop

Document reasoning

  • GDP.pdf

    Professional reasoning over PDF documents, all-pass rate

    • DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: 11.4%
    • GPT 5.6 Luna: 24.0%Top

  • AA-LCRv1.1

    Reasoning across long documents

    • DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: 80.3%
    • GPT 5.6 Luna: 83.7%Top

  • MLCR-AA

    Long-context reasoning over medical records

    • DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: —
    • GPT 5.6 Luna: 20.0%

Reasoning and knowledge

  • Humanity’s Last Exam

    Expert-level questions across academic fields

    • DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: 41.0%Top
    • GPT 5.6 Luna: 39.5%

  • GPQA Diamond

    Graduate-level science questions

    • DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: 92.8%Top
    • GPT 5.6 Luna: 91.1%

Coding

  • Terminal-Benchv4.0

    Practical software engineering in a terminal

    • DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: 14.1%Top
    • GPT 5.6 Luna: 11.6%

  • SciCode

    Scientific computing in Python

    • DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: 51.0%
    • GPT 5.6 Luna: 53.6%Top

Legacy evaluations

  • AA-LCR (unversioned)

    Long-context reasoning, earlier grading

    • DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: 80.3%
    • GPT 5.6 Luna: 83.7%Top

Scores from Artificial Analysis, updated Oct 26, 2026. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 was tested at max reasoning effort; compare scores measured at the same effort.Artificial Analysis

Live routing data

Performance and reliability

Recent averages across requests routed for this model. Your own speed depends on prompt length, reasoning effort and load.

Throughput
74.6 tok/s
Faster than 50% of 253 models
Time to first token
1.8 s
Quicker than 82% of 253 models
Prompt cache hits
82.4%
About $0.0333 per 1M input tokens with caching
Request success (24h)
99.7%
Reliable

Cache hits are the share of input tokens recently served from a prompt cache across all requests. They are not a forecast of your own hit rate.

Hourly request success · last 72 hoursLowest hour 98.2%
  • Healthy (98% or more)
  • Degraded (90–98%)
  • Down (under 90%)
  • No requests

Developers

Use it through the API

Noumen’s API is OpenAI-compatible: any Chat Completions client works with a base URL and a key.

Read the quickstart
curl https://www.noumen.xyz/api/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $NOUMEN_API_KEY" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro-0813",
    "reasoning_effort": "none",
    "messages": [{ "role": "user", "content": "Explain this stack trace." }]
  }'
import os
from openai import OpenAI

client = OpenAI(base_url="https://www.noumen.xyz/api/v1", api_key=os.environ["NOUMEN_API_KEY"])
reply = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro-0813",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Explain this stack trace."}],
)
print(reply.choices[0].message.content)

DeepSeek

Other DeepSeek models, starting with the same family.