DeepSeek · Open weights
DeepSeek V4 Pro (Thinking)
DeepSeek V4 Pro Thinking enables DeepSeek's chain-of-thought mode on the large-scale Mixture-of-Experts model with a 1M-token context window, built for advanced reasoning, coding, long-horizon agent workflows, knowledge, math, and software engineering tasks.
- Reasoning
- Tools
- Structured output
- Input
- Text
- Output
- Text
- Reasoning effort
- none · high · max
- Discovery tier
- Open weights
Pricing
USD per 1M tokens- Input
- $0.70
- Output
- $1.40
- Cache read
- $0.07
Reference prices as published by the model provider. API example
Specifications
- Context window
- 1M
- Max output
- 384K
- Average output (7 days)
- 1.6K tokens
- Longer than 87% of 465 models
Side by side
Compare models
Put DeepSeek V4 Pro (Thinking) next to up to three other models. The comparison stays in the link, so you can share it.
Public evaluations
Benchmarks
Independent evaluation results, with how each score ranks among the models in the Noumen catalog.
Intelligence Index
36.0
Tested at max reasoning effort
Better than 79% of 326 scored models
Indexes
Coding Index
68.8Composite of the coding evaluations
Better than 66% of 168 scored models
Agentic work
AutomationBench-AA
56.7%Workflow automation, penalized for guardrail violations
Better than 71% of 173 scored models
AutomationBench-AA tasks completed
25.9%Workflows finished end to end without a guardrail violation
Better than 76% of 173 scored models
AA-Briefcasev1.1
1,256 EloAgentic knowledge work, rated head to head
Better than 60% of 166 scored models
GDPval-AAv2.1
1,449 EloEconomically valuable occupational tasks, rated head to head
Better than 68% of 187 scored models
Document reasoning
GDP.pdf
11.4%Professional reasoning over PDF documents, all-pass rate
Better than 53% of 171 scored models
AA-LCRv1.1
80.3%Reasoning across long documents
Better than 81% of 309 scored models
Reasoning and knowledge
Humanity’s Last Exam
41.0%Expert-level questions across academic fields
Better than 78% of 323 scored models
GPQA Diamond
92.8%Graduate-level science questions
Better than 89% of 291 scored models
Coding
Terminal-Benchv4.0
14.1%Practical software engineering in a terminal
Better than 67% of 171 scored models
SciCode
51.0%Scientific computing in Python
Better than 54% of 174 scored models
Legacy evaluations
AA-LCR (unversioned)
80.3%Long-context reasoning, earlier grading
Better than 81% of 309 scored models
Scores from Artificial Analysis, updated Oct 26, 2026. DeepSeek V4 Pro (Thinking) was tested at max reasoning effort; compare scores measured at the same effort.Artificial Analysis
Live routing data
Performance and reliability
Recent averages across requests routed for this model. Your own speed depends on prompt length, reasoning effort and load.
- Throughput
- 54.9 tok/s
- Faster than 39% of 250 models
- Time to first token
- 2.7 s
- Quicker than 63% of 250 models
- Prompt cache hits
- 59.9%
- About $0.32 per 1M input tokens with caching
- Request success (24h)
- 99.9%
- Reliable
Cache hits are the share of input tokens recently served from a prompt cache across all requests. They are not a forecast of your own hit rate.
- Healthy (98% or more)
- Degraded (90–98%)
- Down (under 90%)
- No requests
Developers
Use it through the API
Noumen’s API is OpenAI-compatible: any Chat Completions client works with a base URL and a key.
curl https://www.noumen.xyz/api/v1/chat/completions \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $NOUMEN_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"model": "deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro:thinking",
"reasoning_effort": "none",
"messages": [{ "role": "user", "content": "Explain this stack trace." }]
}'import os
from openai import OpenAI
client = OpenAI(base_url="https://www.noumen.xyz/api/v1", api_key=os.environ["NOUMEN_API_KEY"])
reply = client.chat.completions.create(
model="deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro:thinking",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Explain this stack trace."}],
)
print(reply.choices[0].message.content)DeepSeek
Related models
Other DeepSeek models, starting with the same family.