DeepSeek · Open weights
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is the general-availability release of DeepSeek V4 Pro, built for coding, tool use, cybersecurity, automation, and long-horizon agent workflows. DeepSeek reports strong gains over the preview and scores above Opus 4.8 on Terminal Bench 2.1, Cybergym, DeepSWE, and AutomationBench. It supports a 1M-token context window.
- Reasoning
- Tools
- Structured output
- Input
- Text
- Output
- Text
- Reasoning effort
- none · low · high · max
- Discovery tier
- Open weights
Pricing
USD per 1M tokens- Input
- $0.17
- Output
- $0.50
- Cache read
- $0.0053
Reference prices as published by the model provider. API example
Specifications
- Context window
- 1M
- Max output
- 384K
- Average output (7 days)
- 788 tokens
- Longer than 64% of 468 models
Side by side
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 compared
Specifications, prices, speed and benchmark scores next to each other. Benchmarks below show every compared model too.
| DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813DeepSeekThis model | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 ThinkingDeepSeekRemove | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | DeepSeek |
| Discovery tier | Open weights | Open weights |
| Added | Aug 12, 2026 | Oct 17, 2026 |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 1.05M | 1.05M |
| Max output | 384K | 393.22KBest |
| Average output | 788 tokens | 1.2K tokens |
| Pricing, USD per 1M tokens | ||
| Input | $0.17 | $0.10Best |
| Output | $0.50Best | $0.60 |
| Cache read | $0.0053 | $0.003Best |
| Performance | ||
| Throughput | 74.6 tok/s | 230.5 tok/sBest |
| Time to first token | 1.8 sBest | 2.6 s |
| Request success (24h) | 99.7% | 99.8%Best |
| Benchmark indexes | ||
| Intelligence Index | 36.0 | 45.1Best |
| Coding Index | 68.8 | — |
| Capabilities | ||
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | Yes | Yes |
| Vision | No | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning effort | none, low, high, max | none, low, high, max |
Public evaluations
Benchmarks
Independent evaluation results, with how each score ranks among the models in the Noumen catalog.
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Thinking
Intelligence Index
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 081336.0
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Thinking45.1
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 tested at max reasoning effort
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: Better than 79% of 326 scored models
Indexes
Coding Index
Composite of the coding evaluations
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: 68.8
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Thinking: —
Agentic work
AutomationBench-AA
Workflow automation, penalized for guardrail violations
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: 56.7%
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Thinking: 66.6%Top
AutomationBench-AA tasks completed
Workflows finished end to end without a guardrail violation
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: 25.9%
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Thinking: 36.7%Top
AA-Briefcasev1.1
Agentic knowledge work, rated head to head
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: 1,256 Elo
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Thinking: 1,570 EloTop
GDPval-AAv2.1
Economically valuable occupational tasks, rated head to head
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: 1,449 Elo
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Thinking: 1,746 EloTop
Document reasoning
GDP.pdf
Professional reasoning over PDF documents, all-pass rate
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: 11.4%
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Thinking: 17.2%Top
AA-LCRv1.1
Reasoning across long documents
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: 80.3%
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Thinking: 82.7%Top
MLCR-AA
Long-context reasoning over medical records
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: —
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Thinking: 26.7%
Reasoning and knowledge
Humanity’s Last Exam
Expert-level questions across academic fields
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: 41.0%
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Thinking: 43.3%Top
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level science questions
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: 92.8%
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Thinking: —
Coding
Terminal-Benchv4.0
Practical software engineering in a terminal
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: 14.1%
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Thinking: 33.8%Top
SciCode
Scientific computing in Python
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: 51.0%
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Thinking: 55.9%Top
Legacy evaluations
AA-LCR (unversioned)
Long-context reasoning, earlier grading
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: 80.3%
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Thinking: 82.7%Top
Scores from Artificial Analysis, updated Oct 26, 2026. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 was tested at max reasoning effort; compare scores measured at the same effort.Artificial Analysis
Live routing data
Performance and reliability
Recent averages across requests routed for this model. Your own speed depends on prompt length, reasoning effort and load.
- Throughput
- 74.6 tok/s
- Faster than 50% of 253 models
- Time to first token
- 1.8 s
- Quicker than 82% of 253 models
- Prompt cache hits
- 82.4%
- About $0.0333 per 1M input tokens with caching
- Request success (24h)
- 99.7%
- Reliable
Cache hits are the share of input tokens recently served from a prompt cache across all requests. They are not a forecast of your own hit rate.
- Healthy (98% or more)
- Degraded (90–98%)
- Down (under 90%)
- No requests
Developers
Use it through the API
Noumen’s API is OpenAI-compatible: any Chat Completions client works with a base URL and a key.
curl https://www.noumen.xyz/api/v1/chat/completions \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $NOUMEN_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"model": "deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro-0813",
"reasoning_effort": "none",
"messages": [{ "role": "user", "content": "Explain this stack trace." }]
}'import os
from openai import OpenAI
client = OpenAI(base_url="https://www.noumen.xyz/api/v1", api_key=os.environ["NOUMEN_API_KEY"])
reply = client.chat.completions.create(
model="deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro-0813",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Explain this stack trace."}],
)
print(reply.choices[0].message.content)DeepSeek
Related models
Other DeepSeek models, starting with the same family.