NOUMENOpen app
NOUMEN

Z.ai · Open weights

GLM 4.7 Flash

Added Jan 19, 2026Open weights

Compare models

Choose up to 3 models to compare.1 of 3 chosen

Loading models…

Use in the app

GLM-4.7-Flash is a lightweight 30B model optimized for coding and agentic tasks. Balances high performance with efficiency.

  • Reasoning
  • Tools
  • Structured output
Input
Text
Output
Text
Discovery tier
Open weights

Pricing

USD per 1M tokens
Input
$0.07
Output
$0.40
Cache read
$0.01

Reference prices as published by the model provider. API example

Specifications

Context window
200K
Max output
128K
Average output (7 days)
86 tokens
Longer than 8% of 468 models

Side by side

GLM 4.7 Flash compared

Specifications, prices, speed and benchmark scores next to each other. Benchmarks below show every compared model too.

Compare models

Choose up to 3 models to compare.1 of 3 chosen

Loading models…

GLM 4.7 FlashZ.aiThis modelMercury 2InceptionRemove
ProviderZ.aiInception
Discovery tierOpen weightsBalanced
AddedJan 19, 2026Jan 1, 2024
Limits
Context window200KBest128K
Max output128KBest50K
Average output86 tokens—
Pricing, USD per 1M tokens
Input$0.07Best$0.25
Output$0.40Best$0.75
Cache read$0.01Best$0.025
Performance
Throughput28.7 tok/s—
Time to first token2.5 s—
Request success (24h)100.0%—
Benchmark indexes
Intelligence Index10.610.8Best
Coding Index—31.1
Capabilities
ReasoningYesYes
ToolsYesYes
Structured outputYesYes
Reasoning effort——

Public evaluations

Benchmarks

Independent evaluation results, with how each score ranks among the models in the Noumen catalog.

  • GLM 4.7 Flash
  • Mercury 2

Intelligence Index

  • GLM 4.7 Flash10.6
  • Mercury 210.8

GLM 4.7 Flash: Better than 22% of 326 scored models

3.8Catalog models by score55.1

Indexes

  • Coding Index

    Composite of the coding evaluations

    • GLM 4.7 Flash: —
    • Mercury 2: 31.1

Agentic work

  • AutomationBench-AA

    Workflow automation, penalized for guardrail violations

    • GLM 4.7 Flash: —
    • Mercury 2: 1.7%

  • AutomationBench-AA tasks completed

    Workflows finished end to end without a guardrail violation

    • GLM 4.7 Flash: —
    • Mercury 2: 0.3%

  • AA-Briefcasev1.1

    Agentic knowledge work, rated head to head

    • GLM 4.7 Flash: —
    • Mercury 2: 265 Elo

  • GDPval-AAv2.1

    Economically valuable occupational tasks, rated head to head

    • GLM 4.7 Flash: —
    • Mercury 2: 494 Elo

Document reasoning

  • GDP.pdf

    Professional reasoning over PDF documents, all-pass rate

    • GLM 4.7 Flash: —
    • Mercury 2: 3.8%

  • AA-LCRv1.1

    Reasoning across long documents

    • GLM 4.7 Flash: 20.3%
    • Mercury 2: 43.7%Top

Reasoning and knowledge

  • Humanity’s Last Exam

    Expert-level questions across academic fields

    • GLM 4.7 Flash: 5.0%
    • Mercury 2: 17.1%Top

  • GPQA Diamond

    Graduate-level science questions

    • GLM 4.7 Flash: 45.2%
    • Mercury 2: 77.0%Top

  • IFBench

    Following precise output instructions

    • GLM 4.7 Flash: 46.3%
    • Mercury 2: 69.8%Top

Coding

  • Terminal-Benchv4.0

    Practical software engineering in a terminal

    • GLM 4.7 Flash: —
    • Mercury 2: 0.0%

  • SciCode

    Scientific computing in Python

    • GLM 4.7 Flash: —
    • Mercury 2: 37.7%

Legacy evaluations

  • Terminal-Bench Hard

    Earlier terminal task suite

    • GLM 4.7 Flash: 3.8%
    • Mercury 2: 26.5%Top

  • τ²-Bench Telecom

    Tool use in a customer-support simulation

    • GLM 4.7 Flash: 91.8%Top
    • Mercury 2: 70.8%

  • AA-LCR (unversioned)

    Long-context reasoning, earlier grading

    • GLM 4.7 Flash: 20.3%
    • Mercury 2: 43.7%Top

Scores from Artificial Analysis, updated Oct 26, 2026. Artificial Analysis

Live routing data

Performance and reliability

Recent averages across requests routed for this model. Your own speed depends on prompt length, reasoning effort and load.

Throughput
28.7 tok/s
Faster than 20% of 253 models
Time to first token
2.5 s
Quicker than 64% of 253 models
Prompt cache hits
14.7%
About $0.0612 per 1M input tokens with caching
Request success (24h)
100.0%
Reliable

Cache hits are the share of input tokens recently served from a prompt cache across all requests. They are not a forecast of your own hit rate.

Hourly request success · last 72 hoursLowest hour 98.2%
  • Healthy (98% or more)
  • Degraded (90–98%)
  • Down (under 90%)
  • No requests

Developers

Use it through the API

Noumen’s API is OpenAI-compatible: any Chat Completions client works with a base URL and a key.

Read the quickstart
curl https://www.noumen.xyz/api/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $NOUMEN_API_KEY" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "z-ai/glm-4.7-flash",
    "messages": [{ "role": "user", "content": "Explain this stack trace." }]
  }'
import os
from openai import OpenAI

client = OpenAI(base_url="https://www.noumen.xyz/api/v1", api_key=os.environ["NOUMEN_API_KEY"])
reply = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="z-ai/glm-4.7-flash",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Explain this stack trace."}],
)
print(reply.choices[0].message.content)

Z.ai

Other Z.ai models, starting with the same family.