Z.ai · Open weights
GLM 4.7 Flash
GLM-4.7-Flash is a lightweight 30B model optimized for coding and agentic tasks. Balances high performance with efficiency.
- Reasoning
- Tools
- Structured output
- Input
- Text
- Output
- Text
- Discovery tier
- Open weights
Pricing
USD per 1M tokens- Input
- $0.07
- Output
- $0.40
- Cache read
- $0.01
Reference prices as published by the model provider. API example
Specifications
- Context window
- 200K
- Max output
- 128K
- Average output (7 days)
- 86 tokens
- Longer than 8% of 468 models
Side by side
GLM 4.7 Flash compared
Specifications, prices, speed and benchmark scores next to each other. Benchmarks below show every compared model too.
| GLM 4.7 FlashZ.aiThis model | Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview (09/2025) – ThinkingGoogleRemove | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai | |
| Discovery tier | Open weights | Efficient |
| Added | Jan 19, 2026 | Sep 25, 2025 |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 200K | 1.05MBest |
| Max output | 128KBest | 65.54K |
| Average output | 86 tokens | — |
| Pricing, USD per 1M tokens | ||
| Input | $0.07Best | $0.10 |
| Output | $0.40Best | $0.40 |
| Cache read | $0.01 | $0.01 |
| Performance | ||
| Throughput | 28.7 tok/s | — |
| Time to first token | 2.5 s | — |
| Request success (24h) | 100.0%Best | 72.1% |
| Benchmark indexes | ||
| Intelligence Index | 10.6Best | 10.4 |
| Math Index | — | 68.7 |
| Capabilities | ||
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | Yes | Yes |
| Vision | No | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | Yes |
| PDF input | No | Yes |
| Audio input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning effort | — | low, medium, high |
Public evaluations
Benchmarks
Independent evaluation results, with how each score ranks among the models in the Noumen catalog.
- GLM 4.7 Flash
- Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview (09/2025) – Thinking
Intelligence Index
- GLM 4.7 Flash10.6
- Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview (09/2025) – Thinking10.4
GLM 4.7 Flash: Better than 22% of 326 scored models
Indexes
Math Index
Composite of the math evaluations
- GLM 4.7 Flash: —
- Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview (09/2025) – Thinking: 68.7
Document reasoning
AA-LCRv1.1
Reasoning across long documents
- GLM 4.7 Flash: 20.3%
- Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview (09/2025) – Thinking: 64.7%Top
Reasoning and knowledge
Humanity’s Last Exam
Expert-level questions across academic fields
- GLM 4.7 Flash: 5.0%
- Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview (09/2025) – Thinking: 7.0%Top
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level science questions
- GLM 4.7 Flash: 45.2%
- Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview (09/2025) – Thinking: 70.9%Top
MMLU-Pro
Multi-subject knowledge and reasoning
- GLM 4.7 Flash: —
- Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview (09/2025) – Thinking: 80.8%
IFBench
Following precise output instructions
- GLM 4.7 Flash: 46.3%
- Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview (09/2025) – Thinking: 52.6%Top
Coding
LiveCodeBench
Recent competitive programming problems
- GLM 4.7 Flash: —
- Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview (09/2025) – Thinking: 68.8%
Math
AIME 2025
Competition mathematics, 2025 problems
- GLM 4.7 Flash: —
- Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview (09/2025) – Thinking: 68.7%
Legacy evaluations
Terminal-Bench Hard
Earlier terminal task suite
- GLM 4.7 Flash: 3.8%
- Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview (09/2025) – Thinking: 12.9%Top
τ²-Bench Telecom
Tool use in a customer-support simulation
- GLM 4.7 Flash: 91.8%Top
- Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview (09/2025) – Thinking: 30.7%
AA-LCR (unversioned)
Long-context reasoning, earlier grading
- GLM 4.7 Flash: 20.3%
- Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview (09/2025) – Thinking: 64.7%Top
Scores from Artificial Analysis, updated Oct 26, 2026. Artificial Analysis
- GLM 4.7 Flash
- Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview (09/2025) – Thinking
| Leaderboard | GLM 4.7 Flash | Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview (09/2025) – Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Vision Style Control · Creative Writing | Not in top 20 | #10 · 1188.3 |
Ranks among Noumen catalog models on LMArena leaderboards. Only top-20 placements are listed.LMArena
Live routing data
Performance and reliability
Recent averages across requests routed for this model. Your own speed depends on prompt length, reasoning effort and load.
- Throughput
- 28.7 tok/s
- Faster than 20% of 253 models
- Time to first token
- 2.5 s
- Quicker than 64% of 253 models
- Prompt cache hits
- 14.7%
- About $0.0612 per 1M input tokens with caching
- Request success (24h)
- 100.0%
- Reliable
Cache hits are the share of input tokens recently served from a prompt cache across all requests. They are not a forecast of your own hit rate.
- Healthy (98% or more)
- Degraded (90–98%)
- Down (under 90%)
- No requests
Developers
Use it through the API
Noumen’s API is OpenAI-compatible: any Chat Completions client works with a base URL and a key.
curl https://www.noumen.xyz/api/v1/chat/completions \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $NOUMEN_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"model": "z-ai/glm-4.7-flash",
"messages": [{ "role": "user", "content": "Explain this stack trace." }]
}'import os
from openai import OpenAI
client = OpenAI(base_url="https://www.noumen.xyz/api/v1", api_key=os.environ["NOUMEN_API_KEY"])
reply = client.chat.completions.create(
model="z-ai/glm-4.7-flash",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Explain this stack trace."}],
)
print(reply.choices[0].message.content)Z.ai
Related models
Other Z.ai models, starting with the same family.