xAI · Balanced
Grok Build 0.1
Grok Build 0.1 is SpaceXAI's fast coding model trained specifically for agentic software engineering workflows. It supports text and image inputs with text output, and is optimized for interactive coding agents, tool use, and multi-step development tasks. Currently in early access. Content policy rejections can still be charged: SpaceXAI may pass through a $0.05 moderation-failure fee, or a $0.055 usage-guidelines violation fee, depending on which rejection upstream returns.
- Reasoning
- Tools
- Vision
- Structured output
- Input
- Text, Images
- Output
- Text
- Discovery tier
- Balanced
Pricing
USD per 1M tokens- Input
- $1.00
- Output
- $2.00
- Cache read
- $0.20
Reference prices as published by the model provider. API example
Specifications
- Context window
- 256K
- Max output
- —
- Average output (7 days)
- 3K tokens
- Longer than 96% of 473 models
Side by side
Grok Build 0.1 compared
Specifications, prices, speed and benchmark scores next to each other. Benchmarks below show every compared model too.
| Grok Build 0.1xAIThis model | Kimi K2.6 TEEMoonshotRemove | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Moonshot |
| Discovery tier | Balanced | Open weights |
| Added | May 20, 2026 | Apr 21, 2026 |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 256K | 262.14KBest |
| Max output | — | 65.54K |
| Average output | 3K tokens | 3.1K tokens |
| Pricing, USD per 1M tokens | ||
| Input | $1.00Best | $1.50 |
| Output | $2.00Best | $5.25 |
| Cache read | $0.20Best | $0.38 |
| Performance | ||
| Request success (24h) | — | 100.0% |
| Benchmark indexes | ||
| Intelligence Index | 27.2Best | 27.0 |
| Coding Index | 51.5 | 61.8Best |
| Capabilities | ||
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tools | Yes | Yes |
| Vision | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | No |
| Reasoning effort | — | — |
Public evaluations
Benchmarks
Independent evaluation results, with how each score ranks among the models in the Noumen catalog.
- Grok Build 0.1
- Kimi K2.6 TEE
Intelligence Index
- Grok Build 0.127.2
- Kimi K2.6 TEE27.0
Grok Build 0.1: Better than 69% of 326 scored models
Indexes
Coding Index
Composite of the coding evaluations
- Grok Build 0.1: 51.5
- Kimi K2.6 TEE: 61.8Top
Agentic work
AutomationBench-AA
Workflow automation, penalized for guardrail violations
- Grok Build 0.1: —
- Kimi K2.6 TEE: 13.0%
AutomationBench-AA tasks completed
Workflows finished end to end without a guardrail violation
- Grok Build 0.1: —
- Kimi K2.6 TEE: 1.8%
AA-Briefcasev1.1
Agentic knowledge work, rated head to head
- Grok Build 0.1: —
- Kimi K2.6 TEE: 819 Elo
GDPval-AAv2.1
Economically valuable occupational tasks, rated head to head
- Grok Build 0.1: 1,065 EloTop
- Kimi K2.6 TEE: 1,038 Elo
Document reasoning
GDP.pdf
Professional reasoning over PDF documents, all-pass rate
- Grok Build 0.1: —
- Kimi K2.6 TEE: 13.0%
AA-LCRv1.1
Reasoning across long documents
- Grok Build 0.1: 74.7%
- Kimi K2.6 TEE: 81.0%Top
MLCR-AA
Long-context reasoning over medical records
- Grok Build 0.1: —
- Kimi K2.6 TEE: 11.1%
Reasoning and knowledge
Humanity’s Last Exam
Expert-level questions across academic fields
- Grok Build 0.1: 38.3%Top
- Kimi K2.6 TEE: 37.5%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level science questions
- Grok Build 0.1: 89.5%
- Kimi K2.6 TEE: 91.1%Top
IFBench
Following precise output instructions
- Grok Build 0.1: —
- Kimi K2.6 TEE: 76.0%
Coding
Terminal-Benchv4.0
Practical software engineering in a terminal
- Grok Build 0.1: —
- Kimi K2.6 TEE: 0.5%
SciCode
Scientific computing in Python
- Grok Build 0.1: —
- Kimi K2.6 TEE: 51.5%
Legacy evaluations
Terminal-Bench Hard
Earlier terminal task suite
- Grok Build 0.1: —
- Kimi K2.6 TEE: 43.9%
τ²-Bench Telecom
Tool use in a customer-support simulation
- Grok Build 0.1: —
- Kimi K2.6 TEE: 95.9%
AA-LCR (unversioned)
Long-context reasoning, earlier grading
- Grok Build 0.1: 74.7%
- Kimi K2.6 TEE: 81.0%Top
Scores from Artificial Analysis, updated Oct 26, 2026. Artificial Analysis
Live routing data
Performance and reliability
Recent averages across requests routed for this model. Your own speed depends on prompt length, reasoning effort and load.
- Prompt cache hits
- 78.8%
- About $0.37 per 1M input tokens with caching
- Request success (24h)
- 100.0%
- Reliable
Cache hits are the share of input tokens recently served from a prompt cache across all requests. They are not a forecast of your own hit rate.
- Healthy (98% or more)
- Degraded (90–98%)
- Down (under 90%)
- No requests
Developers
Use it through the API
Noumen’s API is OpenAI-compatible: any Chat Completions client works with a base URL and a key.
curl https://www.noumen.xyz/api/v1/chat/completions \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $NOUMEN_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"model": "x-ai/grok-build-0.1",
"messages": [{ "role": "user", "content": "Explain this stack trace." }]
}'import os
from openai import OpenAI
client = OpenAI(base_url="https://www.noumen.xyz/api/v1", api_key=os.environ["NOUMEN_API_KEY"])
reply = client.chat.completions.create(
model="x-ai/grok-build-0.1",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Explain this stack trace."}],
)
print(reply.choices[0].message.content)xAI
Related models
Other xAI models, starting with the same family.