xAI · Frontier
Grok 4.7
Grok 4.7 is SpaceXAI's flagship reasoning model for coding, long-running agentic tasks, and knowledge work. It supports text, image, and file inputs with tool calling and structured outputs. Reasoning is always active, and requests above 200k input tokens use higher long-context rates. Content policy rejections can still be charged: SpaceXAI may pass through a $0.05 moderation-failure fee, or a $0.055 usage-guidelines violation fee, depending on which rejection upstream returns.
- Reasoning
- Tools
- Vision
- Structured output
- Input
- Text, Images
- Output
- Text
- Reasoning effort
- low · medium · high · xhigh
- Discovery tier
- Frontier
Pricing
USD per 1M tokens- Input
- $2.00
- Output
- $6.00
- Cache read
- $0.50
Reference prices as published by the model provider. API example
Specifications
- Context window
- 500K
- Max output
- —
- Average output (7 days)
- 1.3K tokens
- Longer than 80% of 473 models
Side by side
Grok 4.7 compared
Specifications, prices, speed and benchmark scores next to each other. Benchmarks below show every compared model too.
| Grok 4.7xAIThis model | MiMo V2.6 ProxiaomiRemove | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | xiaomi |
| Discovery tier | Frontier | Open weights |
| Added | Sep 21, 2026 | Sep 21, 2026 |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 500K | 1.05MBest |
| Max output | — | 131.07K |
| Average output | 1.3K tokens | 1.2K tokens |
| Pricing, USD per 1M tokens | ||
| Input | $2.00 | $0.44Best |
| Output | $6.00 | $0.87Best |
| Cache read | $0.50 | $0.0036Best |
| Cache write | — | $0.00 |
| Performance | ||
| Throughput | 238.7 tok/sBest | 36.0 tok/s |
| Time to first token | 3.9 sBest | 4.1 s |
| Request success (24h) | 99.9%Best | 99.8% |
| Benchmark indexes | ||
| Intelligence Index | 46.3 | 46.3 |
| Capabilities | ||
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | Yes | Yes |
| Vision | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | Yes |
| Audio input | No | Yes |
| Video input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning effort | low, medium, high, xhigh | none, high |
Public evaluations
Benchmarks
Independent evaluation results, with how each score ranks among the models in the Noumen catalog.
- Grok 4.7
- MiMo V2.6 Pro
Intelligence Index
- Grok 4.746.3
- MiMo V2.6 Pro46.3
Grok 4.7 tested at high reasoning effort
Grok 4.7: Better than 92% of 326 scored models
Agentic work
AutomationBench-AA
Workflow automation, penalized for guardrail violations
- Grok 4.7: 63.5%Top
- MiMo V2.6 Pro: 58.6%
AutomationBench-AA tasks completed
Workflows finished end to end without a guardrail violation
- Grok 4.7: 37.7%Top
- MiMo V2.6 Pro: 25.4%
AA-Briefcasev1.1
Agentic knowledge work, rated head to head
- Grok 4.7: 1,630 EloTop
- MiMo V2.6 Pro: 1,512 Elo
GDPval-AAv2.1
Economically valuable occupational tasks, rated head to head
- Grok 4.7: 1,707 EloTop
- MiMo V2.6 Pro: 1,683 Elo
Document reasoning
GDP.pdf
Professional reasoning over PDF documents, all-pass rate
- Grok 4.7: 23.2%Top
- MiMo V2.6 Pro: 19.2%
AA-LCRv1.1
Reasoning across long documents
- Grok 4.7: 77.0%
- MiMo V2.6 Pro: 86.3%Top
MLCR-AA
Long-context reasoning over medical records
- Grok 4.7: 18.9%Top
- MiMo V2.6 Pro: 12.8%
Reasoning and knowledge
Humanity’s Last Exam
Expert-level questions across academic fields
- Grok 4.7: 42.3%
- MiMo V2.6 Pro: 49.4%Top
Coding
Terminal-Benchv4.0
Practical software engineering in a terminal
- Grok 4.7: 24.7%
- MiMo V2.6 Pro: 34.8%Top
SciCode
Scientific computing in Python
- Grok 4.7: 57.8%
- MiMo V2.6 Pro: 60.9%Top
Legacy evaluations
AA-LCR (unversioned)
Long-context reasoning, earlier grading
- Grok 4.7: 77.0%
- MiMo V2.6 Pro: 86.3%Top
Scores from Artificial Analysis, updated Oct 26, 2026. Grok 4.7 was tested at high reasoning effort; compare scores measured at the same effort.Artificial Analysis
- Grok 4.7
- MiMo V2.6 Pro
| Leaderboard | Grok 4.7 | MiMo V2.6 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Roleplay | #14 · 27.5% | Not in top 20 |
| Creative writing | #12 · 32.2% | Not in top 20 |
Ranks among Noumen catalog models on Use cases leaderboards. Only top-20 placements are listed.
- Grok 4.7
- MiMo V2.6 Pro
| Leaderboard | Grok 4.7 | MiMo V2.6 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Vision Style Control · Homework | #13 · 1323.6 | Not in top 20 |
| WebDev Overall | #13 · 1637.9 | Not in top 20 |
| WebDev · Image To Webdev | #16 · 1585.5 | #13 · 1598.3 |
| WebDev · Webdev | #13 · 1637.9 | Not in top 20 |
| WebDev · Webdev-html | #16 · 1624.8 | #15 · 1625.8 |
| WebDev · Webdev-react | #12 · 1664.6 | Not in top 20 |
| Coding | Not in top 20 | #10 · 1537.6 |
| Longer Query | Not in top 20 | #17 · 1494.0 |
| English | Not in top 20 | #10 · 1495.3 |
| Expert | Not in top 20 | #11 · 1528.5 |
| Hard Prompts English | Not in top 20 | #13 · 1513.3 |
| Industry Mathematical | Not in top 20 | #17 · 1501.9 |
| Industry Software And It Services | Not in top 20 | #10 · 1528.2 |
Ranks among Noumen catalog models on LMArena leaderboards. Only top-20 placements are listed.LMArena
- Grok 4.7
- MiMo V2.6 Pro
| Leaderboard | Grok 4.7 | MiMo V2.6 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierCode Main | #10 · 47.6% | Not in top 20 |
| FrontierCode Extended | #13 · 59.4% | Not in top 20 |
Ranks among Noumen catalog models on FrontierCode leaderboards. Only top-20 placements are listed.FrontierCode
- Grok 4.7
- MiMo V2.6 Pro
| Leaderboard | Grok 4.7 | MiMo V2.6 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1–3) | #10 · 53.0% | Not in top 20 |
| GPQA Diamond | #5 · 92.7% | Not in top 20 |
Ranks among Noumen catalog models on Epoch AI leaderboards. Only top-20 placements are listed.Epoch AI
- Grok 4.7
- MiMo V2.6 Pro
| Leaderboard | Grok 4.7 | MiMo V2.6 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-3 (Default harness) | #9 · 1.8% | Not in top 20 |
Ranks among Noumen catalog models on ARC Prize leaderboards. Only top-20 placements are listed.ARC Prize
- Grok 4.7
- MiMo V2.6 Pro
| Leaderboard | Grok 4.7 | MiMo V2.6 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Creative Writing v3 | #8 · 2012 | Not in top 20 |
| Longform Writing | #5 · 83.0 | Not in top 20 |
Ranks among Noumen catalog models on EQ-Bench leaderboards. Only top-20 placements are listed.EQ-Bench
- Grok 4.7
- MiMo V2.6 Pro
| Leaderboard | Grok 4.7 | MiMo V2.6 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Game Development | #17 · 1315 | Not in top 20 |
Ranks among Noumen catalog models on Design Arena leaderboards. Only top-20 placements are listed.Design Arena
Live routing data
Performance and reliability
Recent averages across requests routed for this model. Your own speed depends on prompt length, reasoning effort and load.
- Throughput
- 238.7 tok/s
- Faster than 89% of 257 models
- Time to first token
- 3.9 s
- Quicker than 40% of 257 models
- Prompt cache hits
- 20.0%
- About $1.70 per 1M input tokens with caching
- Request success (24h)
- 99.9%
- Reliable
Cache hits are the share of input tokens recently served from a prompt cache across all requests. They are not a forecast of your own hit rate.
- Healthy (98% or more)
- Degraded (90–98%)
- Down (under 90%)
- No requests
Developers
Use it through the API
Noumen’s API is OpenAI-compatible: any Chat Completions client works with a base URL and a key.
curl https://www.noumen.xyz/api/v1/chat/completions \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $NOUMEN_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"model": "x-ai/grok-4.7",
"reasoning_effort": "medium",
"messages": [{ "role": "user", "content": "Explain this stack trace." }]
}'import os
from openai import OpenAI
client = OpenAI(base_url="https://www.noumen.xyz/api/v1", api_key=os.environ["NOUMEN_API_KEY"])
reply = client.chat.completions.create(
model="x-ai/grok-4.7",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Explain this stack trace."}],
)
print(reply.choices[0].message.content)xAI
Related models
Other xAI models, starting with the same family.