NOUMENOpen app

OpenAI · Efficient

GPT 6 Luna

Added Sep 22, 2026

Compare models

Choose up to 3 models to compare.1 of 3 chosen

Loading models…

Use in the app

GPT-6 Luna is the fast, cost-efficient model in OpenAI's GPT-6 series, suited for high-volume chat, classification, and lightweight agent workflows.

  • Reasoning
  • Tools
  • Vision
  • Structured output
  • PDF input
Input
Text, Images
Output
Text
Reasoning effort
none · low · medium · high · xhigh · max
Discovery tier
Efficient

Pricing

USD per 1M tokens
Input
$0.10
Output
$0.50
Cache read
$0.01
Cache write
$0.13

Reference prices as published by the model provider. API example

Specifications

Context window
1.1M
Max output
128K
Average output (7 days)
120 tokens
Longer than 12% of 473 models

Side by side

GPT 6 Luna compared

Specifications, prices, speed and benchmark scores next to each other. Benchmarks below show every compared model too.

Compare models

Choose up to 3 models to compare.1 of 3 chosen

Loading models…

GPT 6 LunaOpenAIThis modelGemini Pro LatestGoogleRemove
ProviderOpenAIGoogle
Discovery tierEfficientFrontier
AddedSep 22, 2026Mar 29, 2026
Limits
Context window1.05MBest1.05M
Max output128KBest65.54K
Average output120 tokens—
Pricing, USD per 1M tokens
Input$0.10Best$2.00
Output$0.50Best$12.00
Cache read$0.01Best$0.20
Cache write$0.13Best$0.38
Performance
Throughput225.9 tok/sBest42.2 tok/s
Time to first token3.4 sBest5.1 s
Request success (24h)99.9%100.0%Best
Benchmark indexes
Intelligence Index29.9Best29.7
Coding Index—68.8
Capabilities
ReasoningYesYes
ToolsYesYes
VisionYesYes
Structured outputYesYes
PDF inputYesNo
Audio inputNoYes
Video inputNoYes
Reasoning effortnone, low, medium, high, xhigh, max—

Public evaluations

Benchmarks

Independent evaluation results, with how each score ranks among the models in the Noumen catalog.

  • GPT 6 Luna
  • Gemini Pro Latest

Intelligence Index

  • GPT 6 Luna29.9
  • Gemini Pro Latest29.7

GPT 6 Luna tested at medium reasoning effort

GPT 6 Luna: Better than 73% of 326 scored models

3.8Catalog models by score55.1

Indexes

  • Coding Index

    Composite of the coding evaluations

    • GPT 6 Luna: —
    • Gemini Pro Latest: 68.8

Agentic work

  • AutomationBench-AA

    Workflow automation, penalized for guardrail violations

    • GPT 6 Luna: 40.5%Top
    • Gemini Pro Latest: 35.4%
  • AutomationBench-AA tasks completed

    Workflows finished end to end without a guardrail violation

    • GPT 6 Luna: 10.2%Top
    • Gemini Pro Latest: 9.4%
  • Harvey LAB-AAv1.1

    Legal tasks passed in full, with no material hallucination

    • GPT 6 Luna: —
    • Gemini Pro Latest: 0.0%
  • AA-Briefcasev1.1

    Agentic knowledge work, rated head to head

    • GPT 6 Luna: 1,097 EloTop
    • Gemini Pro Latest: 456 Elo
  • GDPval-AAv2.1

    Economically valuable occupational tasks, rated head to head

    • GPT 6 Luna: 1,263 EloTop
    • Gemini Pro Latest: 791 Elo

Document reasoning

  • GDP.pdf

    Professional reasoning over PDF documents, all-pass rate

    • GPT 6 Luna: 13.8%
    • Gemini Pro Latest: 17.8%Top
  • AA-LCRv1.1

    Reasoning across long documents

    • GPT 6 Luna: 78.3%
    • Gemini Pro Latest: 82.0%Top
  • MLCR-AA

    Long-context reasoning over medical records

    • GPT 6 Luna: 18.3%Top
    • Gemini Pro Latest: 11.1%

Reasoning and knowledge

  • Humanity’s Last Exam

    Expert-level questions across academic fields

    • GPT 6 Luna: 28.3%
    • Gemini Pro Latest: 47.0%Top
  • GPQA Diamond

    Graduate-level science questions

    • GPT 6 Luna: —
    • Gemini Pro Latest: 94.1%
  • IFBench

    Following precise output instructions

    • GPT 6 Luna: —
    • Gemini Pro Latest: 77.1%

Coding

  • Terminal-Benchv4.0

    Practical software engineering in a terminal

    • GPT 6 Luna: 2.5%
    • Gemini Pro Latest: 4.0%Top
  • SciCode

    Scientific computing in Python

    • GPT 6 Luna: 50.9%
    • Gemini Pro Latest: 58.7%Top

Legacy evaluations

  • Terminal-Bench Hard

    Earlier terminal task suite

    • GPT 6 Luna: —
    • Gemini Pro Latest: 53.8%
  • τ²-Bench Telecom

    Tool use in a customer-support simulation

    • GPT 6 Luna: —
    • Gemini Pro Latest: 95.6%
  • AA-LCR (unversioned)

    Long-context reasoning, earlier grading

    • GPT 6 Luna: 78.3%
    • Gemini Pro Latest: 82.0%Top

Scores from Artificial Analysis, updated Oct 26, 2026. GPT 6 Luna was tested at medium reasoning effort; compare scores measured at the same effort.Artificial Analysis

Live routing data

Performance and reliability

Recent averages across requests routed for this model. Your own speed depends on prompt length, reasoning effort and load.

Throughput
225.9 tok/s
Faster than 87% of 260 models
Time to first token
3.4 s
Quicker than 47% of 260 models
Prompt cache hits
54.0%
About $0.0514 per 1M input tokens with caching
Request success (24h)
99.9%
Reliable

Cache hits are the share of input tokens recently served from a prompt cache across all requests. They are not a forecast of your own hit rate.

Hourly request success · last 72 hoursLowest hour 98.5%
  • Healthy (98% or more)
  • Degraded (90–98%)
  • Down (under 90%)
  • No requests

Developers

Use it through the API

Noumen’s API is OpenAI-compatible: any Chat Completions client works with a base URL and a key.

Read the quickstart
curl https://www.noumen.xyz/api/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $NOUMEN_API_KEY" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna",
    "reasoning_effort": "medium",
    "messages": [{ "role": "user", "content": "Explain this stack trace." }]
  }'
import os
from openai import OpenAI

client = OpenAI(base_url="https://www.noumen.xyz/api/v1", api_key=os.environ["NOUMEN_API_KEY"])
reply = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="openai/gpt-6-luna",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Explain this stack trace."}],
)
print(reply.choices[0].message.content)

OpenAI

Other OpenAI models, starting with the same family.