OpenAI · Efficient
GPT 4.1 Mini
Mid-sized GPT 4.1, comparable to GPT4o with a far higher context window, at lower cost and with higher speed.
- Vision
- Input
- Text, Images
- Output
- Text
- Discovery tier
- Efficient
Pricing
USD per 1M tokens- Input
- $0.40
- Output
- $1.60
- Cache read
- $0.10
Reference prices as published by the model provider. API example
Specifications
- Context window
- 1M
- Max output
- 32.8K
- Average output (7 days)
- 19 tokens
- Longer than 0% of 465 models
Side by side
Compare models
Put GPT 4.1 Mini next to up to three other models. The comparison stays in the link, so you can share it.
Public evaluations
Benchmarks
Independent evaluation results, with how each score ranks among the models in the Noumen catalog.
Intelligence Index
10.2
Better than 22% of 326 scored models
Indexes
Coding Index
20.2Composite of the coding evaluations
Better than 13% of 168 scored models
Math Index
46.3Composite of the math evaluations
Better than 44% of 118 scored models
Agentic work
GDPval-AAv2.1
270 EloEconomically valuable occupational tasks, rated head to head
Better than 3% of 187 scored models
Document reasoning
AA-LCRv1.1
44.0%Reasoning across long documents
Better than 21% of 309 scored models
Reasoning and knowledge
Humanity’s Last Exam
5.0%Expert-level questions across academic fields
Better than 16% of 323 scored models
GPQA Diamond
66.4%Graduate-level science questions
Better than 23% of 291 scored models
MMLU-Pro
78.1%Multi-subject knowledge and reasoning
Better than 40% of 132 scored models
IFBench
38.3%Following precise output instructions
Better than 23% of 215 scored models
Coding
LiveCodeBench
48.3%Recent competitive programming problems
Better than 40% of 129 scored models
Math
AIME 2025
46.3%Competition mathematics, 2025 problems
Better than 44% of 118 scored models
AIME
43.0%Competition mathematics
Better than 48% of 72 scored models
MATH-500
92.5%Competition math problems
Better than 53% of 73 scored models
Legacy evaluations
Terminal-Bench Hard
7.6%Earlier terminal task suite
Better than 18% of 212 scored models
τ²-Bench Telecom
52.9%Tool use in a customer-support simulation
Better than 41% of 214 scored models
AA-LCR (unversioned)
44.0%Long-context reasoning, earlier grading
Better than 21% of 309 scored models
Scores from Artificial Analysis, updated Oct 26, 2026. Artificial Analysis
- #11Vision Style Control · Creative Writing1187.3
- #12Vision Style Control · Captioning1193.3
Ranks among Noumen catalog models on LMArena leaderboards. Only top-20 placements are listed.LMArena
Live routing data
Performance and reliability
Recent averages across requests routed for this model. Your own speed depends on prompt length, reasoning effort and load.
- Prompt cache hits
- 57.0%
- About $0.23 per 1M input tokens with caching
- Request success (24h)
- 100.0%
- Reliable
Cache hits are the share of input tokens recently served from a prompt cache across all requests. They are not a forecast of your own hit rate.
- Healthy (98% or more)
- Degraded (90–98%)
- Down (under 90%)
- No requests
Developers
Use it through the API
Noumen’s API is OpenAI-compatible: any Chat Completions client works with a base URL and a key.
curl https://www.noumen.xyz/api/v1/chat/completions \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $NOUMEN_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"model": "openai/gpt-4.1-mini",
"messages": [{ "role": "user", "content": "Explain this stack trace." }]
}'import os
from openai import OpenAI
client = OpenAI(base_url="https://www.noumen.xyz/api/v1", api_key=os.environ["NOUMEN_API_KEY"])
reply = client.chat.completions.create(
model="openai/gpt-4.1-mini",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Explain this stack trace."}],
)
print(reply.choices[0].message.content)OpenAI
Related models
Other OpenAI models, starting with the same family.