NOUMENOpen app
NOUMEN

Meta · Frontier

Muse Wonder

Added Oct 12, 2026

Compare models

Choose up to 3 models to compare.1 of 3 chosen

Loading models…

Use in the app

Meta's Muse Wonder is a frontier reasoning model designed for complex personal and professional agentic tasks. It accepts text, images, audio, video, and PDF documents across a one-million-token context window, supports tool calling and structured output, and always reasons before answering.

  • Reasoning
  • Tools
  • Vision
  • Structured output
  • PDF input
  • Audio input
  • Video input
Input
Text, Images, Video, Audio
Output
Text
Reasoning effort
minimal · low · medium · high · xhigh · max
Discovery tier
Frontier

Pricing

USD per 1M tokens
Input
$4.00
Output
$20.00
Cache read
$0.20

Reference prices as published by the model provider. API example

Specifications

Context window
1M
Max output
—
Average output (7 days)
1.2K tokens
Longer than 77% of 473 models

Side by side

Muse Wonder compared

Specifications, prices, speed and benchmark scores next to each other. Benchmarks below show every compared model too.

Compare models

Choose up to 3 models to compare.1 of 3 chosen

Loading models…

Muse WonderMetaThis modelClaude Fable 5.1AnthropicRemove
ProviderMetaAnthropic
Discovery tierFrontierFrontier
AddedOct 12, 2026Sep 1, 2026
Limits
Context window1.05MBest1M
Max output—128K
Average output1.2K tokens2.3K tokens
Pricing, USD per 1M tokens
Input$4.00Best$10.00
Output$20.00Best$50.00
Cache read$0.20Best$0.25
Cache write—$12.50
Performance
Throughput102.6 tok/s124.8 tok/sBest
Time to first token1.8 sBest11.2 s
Request success (24h)99.5%Best99.0%
Benchmark indexes
Intelligence Index52.453.4Best
Coding Index—81.6
Capabilities
ReasoningYesYes
ToolsYesYes
VisionYesYes
Structured outputYesYes
PDF inputYesYes
Audio inputYesNo
Video inputYesNo
Reasoning effortminimal, low, medium, high, xhigh, maxlow, medium, high, xhigh, max

Public evaluations

Benchmarks

Independent evaluation results, with how each score ranks among the models in the Noumen catalog.

  • Muse Wonder
  • Claude Fable 5.1

Intelligence Index

  • Muse Wonder52.4
  • Claude Fable 5.153.4

Muse Wonder tested at max reasoning effort

Muse Wonder: Better than 97% of 326 scored models

3.8Catalog models by score55.1

Indexes

  • Coding Index

    Composite of the coding evaluations

    • Muse Wonder: —
    • Claude Fable 5.1: 81.6

Agentic work

  • AutomationBench-AA

    Workflow automation, penalized for guardrail violations

    • Muse Wonder: 68.1%Top
    • Claude Fable 5.1: 59.4%

  • AutomationBench-AA tasks completed

    Workflows finished end to end without a guardrail violation

    • Muse Wonder: 39.1%Top
    • Claude Fable 5.1: 32.1%

  • Harvey LAB-AAv1.1

    Legal tasks passed in full, with no material hallucination

    • Muse Wonder: 10.0%Top
    • Claude Fable 5.1: 6.4%

  • AA-Briefcasev1.1

    Agentic knowledge work, rated head to head

    • Muse Wonder: 1,659 Elo
    • Claude Fable 5.1: 1,671 EloTop

  • GDPval-AAv2.1

    Economically valuable occupational tasks, rated head to head

    • Muse Wonder: 1,770 EloTop
    • Claude Fable 5.1: 1,755 Elo

Document reasoning

  • GDP.pdf

    Professional reasoning over PDF documents, all-pass rate

    • Muse Wonder: 30.6%Top
    • Claude Fable 5.1: 26.2%

  • AA-LCRv1.1

    Reasoning across long documents

    • Muse Wonder: 80.7%
    • Claude Fable 5.1: 85.3%Top

  • MLCR-AA

    Long-context reasoning over medical records

    • Muse Wonder: 22.2%Top
    • Claude Fable 5.1: 15.6%

Reasoning and knowledge

  • Humanity’s Last Exam

    Expert-level questions across academic fields

    • Muse Wonder: 50.1%
    • Claude Fable 5.1: 59.1%Top

  • GPQA Diamond

    Graduate-level science questions

    • Muse Wonder: —
    • Claude Fable 5.1: 93.7%

Coding

  • Terminal-Benchv4.0

    Practical software engineering in a terminal

    • Muse Wonder: 52.0%Top
    • Claude Fable 5.1: 52.0%Top

  • SciCode

    Scientific computing in Python

    • Muse Wonder: 60.3%
    • Claude Fable 5.1: 63.1%Top

Legacy evaluations

  • AA-LCR (unversioned)

    Long-context reasoning, earlier grading

    • Muse Wonder: 80.7%
    • Claude Fable 5.1: 85.3%Top

Scores from Artificial Analysis, updated Oct 26, 2026. Muse Wonder was tested at max reasoning effort; compare scores measured at the same effort.Artificial Analysis

Live routing data

Performance and reliability

Recent averages across requests routed for this model. Your own speed depends on prompt length, reasoning effort and load.

Throughput
102.6 tok/s
Faster than 63% of 258 models
Time to first token
1.8 s
Quicker than 80% of 258 models
Prompt cache hits
48.2%
About $2.17 per 1M input tokens with caching
Request success (24h)
99.5%
Reliable

Cache hits are the share of input tokens recently served from a prompt cache across all requests. They are not a forecast of your own hit rate.

Hourly request success · last 72 hoursLowest hour 66.6%
  • Healthy (98% or more)
  • Degraded (90–98%)
  • Down (under 90%)
  • No requests

Developers

Use it through the API

Noumen’s API is OpenAI-compatible: any Chat Completions client works with a base URL and a key.

Read the quickstart
curl https://www.noumen.xyz/api/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $NOUMEN_API_KEY" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "meta/muse-wonder",
    "reasoning_effort": "medium",
    "messages": [{ "role": "user", "content": "Explain this stack trace." }]
  }'
import os
from openai import OpenAI

client = OpenAI(base_url="https://www.noumen.xyz/api/v1", api_key=os.environ["NOUMEN_API_KEY"])
reply = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="meta/muse-wonder",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Explain this stack trace."}],
)
print(reply.choices[0].message.content)

Meta

Other Meta models, starting with the same family.