Meta · Efficient
Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor
A much cheaper opt-in version of Muse Spark 1.2 with the same multimodal coding and agentic capabilities. Prompts and outputs sent to this Contributor model may be used by Meta for training and to improve its products; use the standard Muse Spark 1.2 model if you do not want your data used for training.
- Reasoning
- Tools
- Vision
- Structured output
- PDF input
- Audio input
- Video input
- Parallel tools
- Input
- Text, Images, Video, Audio
- Output
- Text
- Reasoning effort
- minimal · low · medium · high · xhigh
- Discovery tier
- Efficient
Pricing
USD per 1M tokens- Input
- $0.10
- Output
- $0.20
- Cache read
- $0.002
Reference prices as published by the model provider. API example
Specifications
- Context window
- 1M
- Max output
- 65.5K
- Average output (7 days)
- 2.8K tokens
- Longer than 96% of 473 models
Side by side
Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor compared
Specifications, prices, speed and benchmark scores next to each other. Benchmarks below show every compared model too.
| Muse Spark 1.2 ContributorMetaThis model | Muse Spark 1.3MetaRemove | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Meta |
| Discovery tier | Efficient | Frontier |
| Added | Aug 5, 2026 | Sep 2, 2026 |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 1M | 1.05MBest |
| Max output | 65.54K | — |
| Average output | 2.8K tokens | 1.2K tokens |
| Pricing, USD per 1M tokens | ||
| Input | $0.10Best | $1.25 |
| Output | $0.20Best | $4.25 |
| Cache read | $0.002Best | $0.15 |
| Performance | ||
| Throughput | 288.8 tok/s | 292.3 tok/sBest |
| Time to first token | 2.1 sBest | 7.8 s |
| Request success (24h) | 99.7% | 100.0%Best |
| Benchmark indexes | ||
| Intelligence Index | 39.6 | 48.1Best |
| Coding Index | 72.2 | 75.8Best |
| Capabilities | ||
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | Yes | Yes |
| Vision | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | Yes |
| PDF input | Yes | Yes |
| Audio input | Yes | Yes |
| Video input | Yes | Yes |
| Parallel tools | Yes | No |
| Reasoning effort | minimal, low, medium, high, xhigh | minimal, low, medium, high, xhigh |
Public evaluations
Benchmarks
Independent evaluation results, with how each score ranks among the models in the Noumen catalog.
- Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor
- Muse Spark 1.3
Intelligence Index
- Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor39.6
- Muse Spark 1.348.1
Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor tested at xhigh reasoning effort
Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor: Better than 84% of 326 scored models
Indexes
Coding Index
Composite of the coding evaluations
- Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor: 72.2
- Muse Spark 1.3: 75.8Top
Agentic work
AutomationBench-AA
Workflow automation, penalized for guardrail violations
- Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor: 40.6%
- Muse Spark 1.3: 57.9%Top
AutomationBench-AA tasks completed
Workflows finished end to end without a guardrail violation
- Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor: 15.7%
- Muse Spark 1.3: 29.8%Top
Harvey LAB-AAv1.1
Legal tasks passed in full, with no material hallucination
- Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor: —
- Muse Spark 1.3: 8.9%
AA-Briefcasev1.1
Agentic knowledge work, rated head to head
- Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor: 1,327 Elo
- Muse Spark 1.3: 1,581 EloTop
GDPval-AAv2.1
Economically valuable occupational tasks, rated head to head
- Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor: 1,475 Elo
- Muse Spark 1.3: 1,681 EloTop
Document reasoning
GDP.pdf
Professional reasoning over PDF documents, all-pass rate
- Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor: 17.4%
- Muse Spark 1.3: 26.6%Top
AA-LCRv1.1
Reasoning across long documents
- Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor: 79.0%
- Muse Spark 1.3: 83.0%Top
MLCR-AA
Long-context reasoning over medical records
- Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor: 7.2%
- Muse Spark 1.3: 13.9%Top
Reasoning and knowledge
Humanity’s Last Exam
Expert-level questions across academic fields
- Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor: 45.5%
- Muse Spark 1.3: 48.7%Top
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level science questions
- Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor: 90.4%
- Muse Spark 1.3: 93.5%Top
Coding
Terminal-Benchv4.0
Practical software engineering in a terminal
- Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor: 7.1%
- Muse Spark 1.3: 33.3%Top
SciCode
Scientific computing in Python
- Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor: 57.4%
- Muse Spark 1.3: 58.8%Top
Legacy evaluations
AA-LCR (unversioned)
Long-context reasoning, earlier grading
- Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor: 79.0%
- Muse Spark 1.3: 83.0%Top
Scores from Artificial Analysis, updated Oct 26, 2026. Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor was tested at xhigh reasoning effort; compare scores measured at the same effort.Artificial Analysis
- Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor
- Muse Spark 1.3
| Leaderboard | Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor | Muse Spark 1.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Combined | Not in top 20 | #13 · 14.8% |
Ranks among Noumen catalog models on Combined leaderboards. Only top-20 placements are listed.
- Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor
- Muse Spark 1.3
| Leaderboard | Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor | Muse Spark 1.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Roleplay | Not in top 20 | #18 · 18.9% |
| Creative writing | Not in top 20 | #18 · 19.1% |
| Coding | Not in top 20 | #9 · 25.8% |
| Math | Not in top 20 | #9 · 19.4% |
Ranks among Noumen catalog models on Use cases leaderboards. Only top-20 placements are listed.
- Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor
- Muse Spark 1.3
| Leaderboard | Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor | Muse Spark 1.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | Not in top 20 | #9 · 1495.6 |
| Coding | Not in top 20 | #13 · 1535.8 |
| Math | Not in top 20 | #9 · 1509.8 |
| Longer Query | Not in top 20 | #16 · 1497.1 |
| Instruction Following | Not in top 20 | #16 · 1484.6 |
| Hard Prompts | Not in top 20 | #9 · 1517.2 |
| Chinese | Not in top 20 | #16 · 1531.2 |
| English | Not in top 20 | #7 · 1502.4 |
| Exclude Ties | Not in top 20 | #8 · 1513.7 |
| Expert | Not in top 20 | #13 · 1527.1 |
| French | Not in top 20 | #3 · 1525.2 |
| German | Not in top 20 | #1 · 1516.5 |
| Hard Prompts English | Not in top 20 | #10 · 1516.2 |
| Industry Business And Management And Financial Operations | Not in top 20 | #4 · 1500.6 |
| Industry Entertainment And Sports And Media | Not in top 20 | #17 · 1460.0 |
| Industry Legal And Government | Not in top 20 | #10 · 1502.3 |
| Industry Life And Physical And Social Science | Not in top 20 | #12 · 1512.0 |
| Industry Mathematical | Not in top 20 | #18 · 1499.8 |
| Industry Medicine And Healthcare | Not in top 20 | #15 · 1501.1 |
| Industry Software And It Services | Not in top 20 | #11 · 1528.0 |
| Industry Writing And Literature And Language | Not in top 20 | #16 · 1473.7 |
| Korean | Not in top 20 | #4 · 1492.8 |
| Multi Turn | Not in top 20 | #13 · 1493.7 |
| Non English | Not in top 20 | #10 · 1484.3 |
| Polish | Not in top 20 | #15 · 1485.2 |
| Russian | Not in top 20 | #11 · 1499.4 |
| Spanish | Not in top 20 | #7 · 1491.2 |
| Vision Style Control Overall | Not in top 20 | #9 · 1289.6 |
| Vision Style Control · Chinese | Not in top 20 | #8 · 1347.3 |
| Vision Style Control · Diagram | Not in top 20 | #9 · 1321.9 |
| Vision Style Control · English | Not in top 20 | #15 · 1279.3 |
| Vision Style Control · Humor | Not in top 20 | #16 · 1267.1 |
| Vision Style Control · Ocr | Not in top 20 | #6 · 1307.3 |
| WebDev Overall | Not in top 20 | #10 · 1657.2 |
| WebDev · Image To Webdev | Not in top 20 | #8 · 1640.4 |
| WebDev · Webdev | Not in top 20 | #10 · 1657.2 |
| WebDev · Webdev-html | Not in top 20 | #10 · 1652.7 |
| WebDev · Webdev-react | Not in top 20 | #10 · 1670.6 |
| Document Overall | Not in top 20 | #12 · 1470.7 |
| Document Style Control Overall | Not in top 20 | #15 · 1467.9 |
Ranks among Noumen catalog models on LMArena leaderboards. Only top-20 placements are listed.LMArena
- Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor
- Muse Spark 1.3
| Leaderboard | Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor | Muse Spark 1.3 |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1–3) | Not in top 20 | #3 · 74.0% |
Ranks among Noumen catalog models on Epoch AI leaderboards. Only top-20 placements are listed.Epoch AI
- Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor
- Muse Spark 1.3
| Leaderboard | Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor | Muse Spark 1.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Creative Writing v3 | Not in top 20 | #16 · 1907 |
| Longform Writing | Not in top 20 | #8 · 82.8 |
Ranks among Noumen catalog models on EQ-Bench leaderboards. Only top-20 placements are listed.EQ-Bench
- Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor
- Muse Spark 1.3
| Leaderboard | Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor | Muse Spark 1.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Game Development | Not in top 20 | #11 · 1344 |
| Website | Not in top 20 | #2 · 1355 |
| UI Component | Not in top 20 | #7 · 1344 |
| Data Visualization | Not in top 20 | #5 · 1342 |
| SVG | Not in top 20 | #4 · 1320 |
| 3D | Not in top 20 | #7 · 1393 |
| ASCII Art | Not in top 20 | #7 · 1278 |
| Web Apps | Not in top 20 | #6 · 1297 |
| Full Stack | Not in top 20 | #4 · 1312 |
| Mobile Apps | Not in top 20 | #12 · 1220 |
Ranks among Noumen catalog models on Design Arena leaderboards. Only top-20 placements are listed.Design Arena
Live routing data
Performance and reliability
Recent averages across requests routed for this model. Your own speed depends on prompt length, reasoning effort and load.
- Throughput
- 288.8 tok/s
- Faster than 91% of 260 models
- Time to first token
- 2.1 s
- Quicker than 73% of 260 models
- Prompt cache hits
- 28.8%
- About $0.0718 per 1M input tokens with caching
- Request success (24h)
- 99.7%
- Reliable
Cache hits are the share of input tokens recently served from a prompt cache across all requests. They are not a forecast of your own hit rate.
- Healthy (98% or more)
- Degraded (90–98%)
- Down (under 90%)
- No requests
Developers
Use it through the API
Noumen’s API is OpenAI-compatible: any Chat Completions client works with a base URL and a key.
curl https://www.noumen.xyz/api/v1/chat/completions \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $NOUMEN_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"model": "meta/muse-spark-1.2-contributor",
"reasoning_effort": "medium",
"messages": [{ "role": "user", "content": "Explain this stack trace." }]
}'import os
from openai import OpenAI
client = OpenAI(base_url="https://www.noumen.xyz/api/v1", api_key=os.environ["NOUMEN_API_KEY"])
reply = client.chat.completions.create(
model="meta/muse-spark-1.2-contributor",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Explain this stack trace."}],
)
print(reply.choices[0].message.content)Meta
Related models
Other Meta models, starting with the same family.