NOUMENOpen app
NOUMEN

Google · Efficient

Gemini Flash Lite Latest

Added Mar 29, 2026

Compare models

Choose up to 3 models to compare.1 of 3 chosen

Loading models…

Use in the app

Compatibility alias that routes to the newest version of Gemini Flash Lite. Currently routes to Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite.

  • Reasoning
  • Tools
  • Vision
  • Structured output
  • PDF input
  • Audio input
  • Video input
Input
Text, Images, Video, Audio
Output
Text
Reasoning effort
minimal · low · medium · high
Discovery tier
Efficient

Pricing

USD per 1M tokens
Input
$0.30
Output
$2.50
Cache read
$0.03
Cache write
$0.0833

Reference prices as published by the model provider. API example

Specifications

Context window
1M
Max output
65.5K

Side by side

Gemini Flash Lite Latest compared

Specifications, prices, speed and benchmark scores next to each other. Benchmarks below show every compared model too.

Compare models

Choose up to 3 models to compare.1 of 3 chosen

Loading models…

Gemini Flash Lite LatestGoogleThis modelGemini 3.1 Flash LiteGoogleRemove
ProviderGoogleGoogle
Discovery tierEfficientEfficient
AddedMar 29, 2026Mar 3, 2026
Limits
Context window1.05M1.05M
Max output65.54K65.54K
Average output—669 tokens
Pricing, USD per 1M tokens
Input$0.30$0.25Best
Output$2.50$1.50Best
Cache read$0.03$0.025Best
Cache write$0.0833$0.0833
Performance
Request success (24h)99.8%100.0%Best
Benchmark indexes
Intelligence Index22.2Best15.6
Coding Index49.3Best34.7
Capabilities
ReasoningYesYes
ToolsYesYes
VisionYesYes
Structured outputYesYes
PDF inputYesYes
Audio inputYesYes
Video inputYesYes
Reasoning effortminimal, low, medium, highminimal, low, medium, high

Public evaluations

Benchmarks

Independent evaluation results, with how each score ranks among the models in the Noumen catalog.

  • Gemini Flash Lite Latest
  • Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

Intelligence Index

  • Gemini Flash Lite Latest22.2
  • Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite15.6

Gemini Flash Lite Latest: Better than 53% of 326 scored models

3.8Catalog models by score55.1

Indexes

  • Coding Index

    Composite of the coding evaluations

    • Gemini Flash Lite Latest: 49.3Top
    • Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 34.7

Agentic work

  • AutomationBench-AA

    Workflow automation, penalized for guardrail violations

    • Gemini Flash Lite Latest: 25.0%Top
    • Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 6.8%

  • AutomationBench-AA tasks completed

    Workflows finished end to end without a guardrail violation

    • Gemini Flash Lite Latest: 3.3%Top
    • Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 0.5%

  • Harvey LAB-AAv1.1

    Legal tasks passed in full, with no material hallucination

    • Gemini Flash Lite Latest: 0.0%
    • Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: —

  • AA-Briefcasev1.1

    Agentic knowledge work, rated head to head

    • Gemini Flash Lite Latest: 650 EloTop
    • Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 207 Elo

  • GDPval-AAv2.1

    Economically valuable occupational tasks, rated head to head

    • Gemini Flash Lite Latest: 985 EloTop
    • Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 430 Elo

Document reasoning

  • GDP.pdf

    Professional reasoning over PDF documents, all-pass rate

    • Gemini Flash Lite Latest: 13.6%Top
    • Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 7.8%

  • AA-LCRv1.1

    Reasoning across long documents

    • Gemini Flash Lite Latest: 76.0%Top
    • Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 74.3%

  • MLCR-AA

    Long-context reasoning over medical records

    • Gemini Flash Lite Latest: 10.6%Top
    • Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 5.0%

Reasoning and knowledge

  • Humanity’s Last Exam

    Expert-level questions across academic fields

    • Gemini Flash Lite Latest: 18.8%Top
    • Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 17.2%

  • GPQA Diamond

    Graduate-level science questions

    • Gemini Flash Lite Latest: 83.8%Top
    • Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 82.2%

  • IFBench

    Following precise output instructions

    • Gemini Flash Lite Latest: —
    • Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 77.2%

Coding

  • Terminal-Benchv4.0

    Practical software engineering in a terminal

    • Gemini Flash Lite Latest: 1.0%Top
    • Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 0.5%

  • SciCode

    Scientific computing in Python

    • Gemini Flash Lite Latest: 41.3%
    • Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 43.4%Top

Legacy evaluations

  • Terminal-Bench Hard

    Earlier terminal task suite

    • Gemini Flash Lite Latest: —
    • Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 24.2%

  • τ²-Bench Telecom

    Tool use in a customer-support simulation

    • Gemini Flash Lite Latest: —
    • Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 31.3%

  • AA-LCR (unversioned)

    Long-context reasoning, earlier grading

    • Gemini Flash Lite Latest: 76.0%Top
    • Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 74.3%

Scores from Artificial Analysis, updated Oct 26, 2026. Artificial Analysis

Live routing data

Performance and reliability

Recent averages across requests routed for this model. Your own speed depends on prompt length, reasoning effort and load.

Prompt cache hits
21.0%
About $0.24 per 1M input tokens with caching
Request success (24h)
99.9%
Reliable

Cache hits are the share of input tokens recently served from a prompt cache across all requests. They are not a forecast of your own hit rate.

Hourly request success · last 72 hoursLowest hour 94.7%
  • Healthy (98% or more)
  • Degraded (90–98%)
  • Down (under 90%)
  • No requests

Developers

Use it through the API

Noumen’s API is OpenAI-compatible: any Chat Completions client works with a base URL and a key.

Read the quickstart
curl https://www.noumen.xyz/api/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $NOUMEN_API_KEY" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "google/gemini-flash-lite-latest",
    "reasoning_effort": "medium",
    "messages": [{ "role": "user", "content": "Explain this stack trace." }]
  }'
import os
from openai import OpenAI

client = OpenAI(base_url="https://www.noumen.xyz/api/v1", api_key=os.environ["NOUMEN_API_KEY"])
reply = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="google/gemini-flash-lite-latest",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Explain this stack trace."}],
)
print(reply.choices[0].message.content)

Google

Other Google models, starting with the same family.