Google · Efficient
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
Google's cost-efficient Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite model for high-volume multimodal reasoning, tool use, and structured-output workloads.
- Reasoning
- Tools
- Vision
- Structured output
- PDF input
- Audio input
- Video input
- Input
- Text, Images, Video, Audio
- Output
- Text
- Reasoning effort
- minimal · low · medium · high
- Discovery tier
- Efficient
Pricing
USD per 1M tokens- Input
- $0.30
- Output
- $2.50
- Cache read
- $0.03
- Cache write
- $0.0833
Reference prices as published by the model provider. API example
Specifications
- Context window
- 1M
- Max output
- 65.5K
- Average output (7 days)
- 178 tokens
- Longer than 19% of 465 models
Side by side
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite compared
Specifications, prices, speed and benchmark scores next to each other. Benchmarks below show every compared model too.
| Gemini 3.5 Flash LiteGoogleThis model | Kimi K2 ThinkingMoonshotRemove | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot | |
| Discovery tier | Efficient | Open weights |
| Added | Jul 21, 2026 | Nov 6, 2025 |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 1.05MBest | 262.14K |
| Max output | 65.54K | 98.3KBest |
| Average output | 178 tokens | 1.9K tokens |
| Pricing, USD per 1M tokens | ||
| Input | $0.30Best | $0.60 |
| Output | $2.50 | $2.50 |
| Cache read | $0.03Best | $0.15 |
| Cache write | $0.0833 | — |
| Performance | ||
| Throughput | 237.4 tok/sBest | 48.0 tok/s |
| Time to first token | 1.4 sBest | 2.6 s |
| Request success (24h) | 99.9%Best | 99.6% |
| Benchmark indexes | ||
| Intelligence Index | 22.2Best | 22.0 |
| Coding Index | 49.3 | — |
| Math Index | — | 94.7 |
| Capabilities | ||
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | Yes | Yes |
| Vision | Yes | No |
| Structured output | Yes | Yes |
| PDF input | Yes | No |
| Audio input | Yes | No |
| Video input | Yes | No |
| Reasoning effort | minimal, low, medium, high | — |
Public evaluations
Benchmarks
Independent evaluation results, with how each score ranks among the models in the Noumen catalog.
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
- Kimi K2 Thinking
Intelligence Index
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite22.2
- Kimi K2 Thinking22.0
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: Better than 53% of 326 scored models
Indexes
Coding Index
Composite of the coding evaluations
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 49.3
- Kimi K2 Thinking: —
Math Index
Composite of the math evaluations
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: —
- Kimi K2 Thinking: 94.7
Agentic work
AutomationBench-AA
Workflow automation, penalized for guardrail violations
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.0%
- Kimi K2 Thinking: —
AutomationBench-AA tasks completed
Workflows finished end to end without a guardrail violation
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 3.3%
- Kimi K2 Thinking: —
Harvey LAB-AAv1.1
Legal tasks passed in full, with no material hallucination
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 0.0%
- Kimi K2 Thinking: —
AA-Briefcasev1.1
Agentic knowledge work, rated head to head
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 650 Elo
- Kimi K2 Thinking: —
GDPval-AAv2.1
Economically valuable occupational tasks, rated head to head
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 985 Elo
- Kimi K2 Thinking: —
Document reasoning
GDP.pdf
Professional reasoning over PDF documents, all-pass rate
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 13.6%
- Kimi K2 Thinking: —
AA-LCRv1.1
Reasoning across long documents
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 76.0%Top
- Kimi K2 Thinking: 72.0%
MLCR-AA
Long-context reasoning over medical records
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 10.6%
- Kimi K2 Thinking: —
Reasoning and knowledge
Humanity’s Last Exam
Expert-level questions across academic fields
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 18.8%
- Kimi K2 Thinking: 23.8%Top
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level science questions
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 83.8%Top
- Kimi K2 Thinking: 83.8%Top
MMLU-Pro
Multi-subject knowledge and reasoning
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: —
- Kimi K2 Thinking: 84.8%
IFBench
Following precise output instructions
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: —
- Kimi K2 Thinking: 68.1%
Coding
Terminal-Benchv4.0
Practical software engineering in a terminal
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 1.0%
- Kimi K2 Thinking: —
SciCode
Scientific computing in Python
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 41.3%
- Kimi K2 Thinking: —
LiveCodeBench
Recent competitive programming problems
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: —
- Kimi K2 Thinking: 85.3%
Math
AIME 2025
Competition mathematics, 2025 problems
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: —
- Kimi K2 Thinking: 94.7%
Legacy evaluations
Terminal-Bench Hard
Earlier terminal task suite
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: —
- Kimi K2 Thinking: 31.1%
τ²-Bench Telecom
Tool use in a customer-support simulation
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: —
- Kimi K2 Thinking: 93.0%
AA-LCR (unversioned)
Long-context reasoning, earlier grading
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 76.0%Top
- Kimi K2 Thinking: 72.0%
Scores from Artificial Analysis, updated Oct 26, 2026. Artificial Analysis
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
- Kimi K2 Thinking
| Leaderboard | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Kimi K2 Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Vision Style Control · Humor | #9 · 1278.4 | Not in top 20 |
Ranks among Noumen catalog models on LMArena leaderboards. Only top-20 placements are listed.LMArena
Live routing data
Performance and reliability
Recent averages across requests routed for this model. Your own speed depends on prompt length, reasoning effort and load.
- Throughput
- 237.4 tok/s
- Faster than 89% of 250 models
- Time to first token
- 1.4 s
- Quicker than 88% of 250 models
- Prompt cache hits
- 21.4%
- About $0.24 per 1M input tokens with caching
- Request success (24h)
- 99.9%
- Reliable
Cache hits are the share of input tokens recently served from a prompt cache across all requests. They are not a forecast of your own hit rate.
- Healthy (98% or more)
- Degraded (90–98%)
- Down (under 90%)
- No requests
Developers
Use it through the API
Noumen’s API is OpenAI-compatible: any Chat Completions client works with a base URL and a key.
curl https://www.noumen.xyz/api/v1/chat/completions \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $NOUMEN_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"model": "google/gemini-3.5-flash-lite",
"reasoning_effort": "medium",
"messages": [{ "role": "user", "content": "Explain this stack trace." }]
}'import os
from openai import OpenAI
client = OpenAI(base_url="https://www.noumen.xyz/api/v1", api_key=os.environ["NOUMEN_API_KEY"])
reply = client.chat.completions.create(
model="google/gemini-3.5-flash-lite",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Explain this stack trace."}],
)
print(reply.choices[0].message.content)Related models
Other Google models, starting with the same family.