Google · Frontier
Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)
Gemini 3.1 Pro preview is built for tasks where simple answers are not enough. Stronger core reasoning for complex coding, math, and long-context workflows, with multimodal support and a reported 77.1% verified score on ARC-AGI-2. NOTE: Inputs > 200k tokens are charged at 2x input and 1.5x output rates.
- Reasoning
- Tools
- Vision
- Structured output
- Audio input
- Video input
- Input
- Text, Images, Video, Audio
- Output
- Text
- Reasoning effort
- low · medium · high
- Discovery tier
- Frontier
Pricing
USD per 1M tokens- Input
- $2.00
- Output
- $12.00
- Cache read
- $0.20
- Cache write
- $0.38
Reference prices as published by the model provider. API example
Specifications
- Context window
- 1M
- Max output
- 65.5K
- Average output (7 days)
- 699 tokens
- Longer than 62% of 465 models
Side by side
Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview) compared
Specifications, prices, speed and benchmark scores next to each other. Benchmarks below show every compared model too.
| Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)GoogleThis model | Gemini Pro LatestGoogleRemove | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Discovery tier | Frontier | Frontier |
| Added | Feb 19, 2026 | Mar 29, 2026 |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 1.05M | 1.05M |
| Max output | 65.54K | 65.54K |
| Average output | 699 tokens | — |
| Pricing, USD per 1M tokens | ||
| Input | $2.00 | $2.00 |
| Output | $12.00 | $12.00 |
| Cache read | $0.20 | $0.20 |
| Cache write | $0.38 | $0.38 |
| Performance | ||
| Throughput | 68.0 tok/sBest | 36.1 tok/s |
| Time to first token | 4.7 sBest | 8.7 s |
| Request success (24h) | 99.8% | 100.0%Best |
| Benchmark indexes | ||
| Intelligence Index | 29.7 | 29.7 |
| Coding Index | 68.8 | 68.8 |
| Capabilities | ||
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | Yes | Yes |
| Vision | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | Yes |
| Audio input | Yes | Yes |
| Video input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning effort | low, medium, high | — |
Public evaluations
Benchmarks
Independent evaluation results, with how each score ranks among the models in the Noumen catalog.
- Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)
- Gemini Pro Latest
Intelligence Index
- Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)29.7
- Gemini Pro Latest29.7
Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview): Better than 71% of 326 scored models
Indexes
Coding Index
Composite of the coding evaluations
- Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview): 68.8Top
- Gemini Pro Latest: 68.8Top
Agentic work
AutomationBench-AA
Workflow automation, penalized for guardrail violations
- Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview): 35.4%Top
- Gemini Pro Latest: 35.4%Top
AutomationBench-AA tasks completed
Workflows finished end to end without a guardrail violation
- Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview): 9.4%Top
- Gemini Pro Latest: 9.4%Top
Harvey LAB-AAv1.1
Legal tasks passed in full, with no material hallucination
- Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview): 0.0%Top
- Gemini Pro Latest: 0.0%Top
AA-Briefcasev1.1
Agentic knowledge work, rated head to head
- Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview): 456 EloTop
- Gemini Pro Latest: 456 EloTop
GDPval-AAv2.1
Economically valuable occupational tasks, rated head to head
- Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview): 791 EloTop
- Gemini Pro Latest: 791 EloTop
Document reasoning
GDP.pdf
Professional reasoning over PDF documents, all-pass rate
- Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview): 17.8%Top
- Gemini Pro Latest: 17.8%Top
AA-LCRv1.1
Reasoning across long documents
- Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview): 82.0%Top
- Gemini Pro Latest: 82.0%Top
MLCR-AA
Long-context reasoning over medical records
- Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview): 11.1%Top
- Gemini Pro Latest: 11.1%Top
Reasoning and knowledge
Humanity’s Last Exam
Expert-level questions across academic fields
- Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview): 47.0%Top
- Gemini Pro Latest: 47.0%Top
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level science questions
- Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview): 94.1%Top
- Gemini Pro Latest: 94.1%Top
IFBench
Following precise output instructions
- Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview): 77.1%Top
- Gemini Pro Latest: 77.1%Top
Coding
Terminal-Benchv4.0
Practical software engineering in a terminal
- Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview): 4.0%Top
- Gemini Pro Latest: 4.0%Top
SciCode
Scientific computing in Python
- Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview): 58.7%Top
- Gemini Pro Latest: 58.7%Top
Legacy evaluations
Terminal-Bench Hard
Earlier terminal task suite
- Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview): 53.8%Top
- Gemini Pro Latest: 53.8%Top
τ²-Bench Telecom
Tool use in a customer-support simulation
- Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview): 95.6%Top
- Gemini Pro Latest: 95.6%Top
AA-LCR (unversioned)
Long-context reasoning, earlier grading
- Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview): 82.0%Top
- Gemini Pro Latest: 82.0%Top
Scores from Artificial Analysis, updated Oct 26, 2026. Artificial Analysis
- Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)
- Gemini Pro Latest
| Leaderboard | Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview) | Gemini Pro Latest |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | #15 · 1487.0 | Not in top 20 |
| Longer Query | #14 · 1499.2 | Not in top 20 |
| Creative Writing | #10 · 1480.7 | Not in top 20 |
| Instruction Following | #17 · 1480.3 | Not in top 20 |
| Hard Prompts | #17 · 1507.6 | Not in top 20 |
| Chinese | #19 · 1528.3 | Not in top 20 |
| Exclude Ties | #14 · 1501.6 | Not in top 20 |
| German | #12 · 1493.8 | Not in top 20 |
| Industry Entertainment And Sports And Media | #11 · 1469.3 | Not in top 20 |
| Industry Legal And Government | #11 · 1498.4 | Not in top 20 |
| Industry Life And Physical And Social Science | #13 · 1510.1 | Not in top 20 |
| Industry Medicine And Healthcare | #13 · 1505.1 | Not in top 20 |
| Industry Writing And Literature And Language | #10 · 1481.8 | Not in top 20 |
| Japanese | #11 · 1496.2 | Not in top 20 |
| Korean | #15 · 1455.1 | Not in top 20 |
| Multi Turn | #11 · 1496.4 | Not in top 20 |
| Non English | #14 · 1479.3 | Not in top 20 |
| Polish | #12 · 1494.8 | Not in top 20 |
| Russian | #10 · 1501.8 | Not in top 20 |
| Spanish | #13 · 1483.2 | Not in top 20 |
| Vision Style Control · Creative Writing | #1 · 1372.9 | Not in top 20 |
| Vision Style Control · Captioning | #1 · 1281.6 | Not in top 20 |
| Vision Style Control · Chinese | #11 · 1339.2 | Not in top 20 |
| Vision Style Control · Creative Writing Vision | #5 · 1300.6 | Not in top 20 |
| Vision Style Control · Entity Recognition | #2 · 1284.0 | Not in top 20 |
| Vision Style Control · Homework | #18 · 1310.2 | Not in top 20 |
| Vision Style Control · Humor | #2 · 1300.0 | Not in top 20 |
| Search Overall | #12 · 1208.8 | Not in top 20 |
Ranks among Noumen catalog models on LMArena leaderboards. Only top-20 placements are listed.LMArena
- Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)
- Gemini Pro Latest
| Leaderboard | Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview) | Gemini Pro Latest |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1–3) | #6 · 59.6% | Not in top 20 |
| GPQA Diamond | #2 · 94.4% | Not in top 20 |
Ranks among Noumen catalog models on Epoch AI leaderboards. Only top-20 placements are listed.Epoch AI
- Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)
- Gemini Pro Latest
| Leaderboard | Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview) | Gemini Pro Latest |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-1 | #7 · 98.0% | Not in top 20 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | #17 · 77.1% | Not in top 20 |
| ARC-AGI-3 (Default harness) | #15 · 0.4% | Not in top 20 |
Ranks among Noumen catalog models on ARC Prize leaderboards. Only top-20 placements are listed.ARC Prize
- Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)
- Gemini Pro Latest
| Leaderboard | Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview) | Gemini Pro Latest |
|---|---|---|
| EQ-Bench 3 | #9 · 1553 | Not in top 20 |
Ranks among Noumen catalog models on EQ-Bench leaderboards. Only top-20 placements are listed.EQ-Bench
- Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)
- Gemini Pro Latest
| Leaderboard | Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview) | Gemini Pro Latest |
|---|---|---|
| SVG | #12 · 1283 | Not in top 20 |
| ASCII Art | #11 · 1267 | Not in top 20 |
| Agentic Game Dev | #19 · 1078 | Not in top 20 |
Ranks among Noumen catalog models on Design Arena leaderboards. Only top-20 placements are listed.Design Arena
Live routing data
Performance and reliability
Recent averages across requests routed for this model. Your own speed depends on prompt length, reasoning effort and load.
- Throughput
- 68.0 tok/s
- Faster than 45% of 250 models
- Time to first token
- 4.7 s
- Quicker than 36% of 250 models
- Prompt cache hits
- 28.0%
- About $1.50 per 1M input tokens with caching
- Request success (24h)
- 99.8%
- Reliable
Cache hits are the share of input tokens recently served from a prompt cache across all requests. They are not a forecast of your own hit rate.
- Healthy (98% or more)
- Degraded (90–98%)
- Down (under 90%)
- No requests
Developers
Use it through the API
Noumen’s API is OpenAI-compatible: any Chat Completions client works with a base URL and a key.
curl https://www.noumen.xyz/api/v1/chat/completions \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $NOUMEN_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"model": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview",
"reasoning_effort": "medium",
"messages": [{ "role": "user", "content": "Explain this stack trace." }]
}'import os
from openai import OpenAI
client = OpenAI(base_url="https://www.noumen.xyz/api/v1", api_key=os.environ["NOUMEN_API_KEY"])
reply = client.chat.completions.create(
model="google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Explain this stack trace."}],
)
print(reply.choices[0].message.content)Related models
Other Google models, starting with the same family.