Google · Frontier
Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview Low)
Gemini 3.1 Pro preview low-reasoning variant.
- Reasoning
- Tools
- Vision
- Structured output
- Audio input
- Input
- Text, Images, Audio
- Output
- Text
- Discovery tier
- Frontier
Pricing
USD per 1M tokens- Input
- $2.00
- Output
- $12.00
- Cache read
- $0.20
- Cache write
- $0.38
Reference prices as published by the model provider. API example
Specifications
- Context window
- 1M
- Max output
- 65.5K
- Average output (7 days)
- 1.6K tokens
- Longer than 87% of 465 models
Side by side
Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview Low) compared
Specifications, prices, speed and benchmark scores next to each other. Benchmarks below show every compared model too.
| Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview Low)GoogleThis model | DiffusionGemmaGoogleRemove | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Discovery tier | Frontier | Open weights |
| Added | Feb 21, 2026 | Sep 19, 2026 |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 1.05MBest | 262.14K |
| Max output | 65.54KBest | 32.77K |
| Average output | 1.6K tokens | 266 tokens |
| Pricing, USD per 1M tokens | ||
| Input | $2.00 | $0.05Best |
| Output | $12.00 | $0.15Best |
| Cache read | $0.20 | $0.025Best |
| Cache write | $0.38 | — |
| Performance | ||
| Throughput | 101.1 tok/s | — |
| Time to first token | 4.9 s | — |
| Request success (24h) | 95.0% | — |
| Benchmark indexes | ||
| Intelligence Index | 29.7Best | 9.5 |
| Coding Index | 68.8Best | 19.7 |
| Capabilities | ||
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | Yes | No |
| Vision | Yes | No |
| Structured output | Yes | No |
| Audio input | Yes | No |
| Reasoning effort | — | none, xhigh |
Public evaluations
Benchmarks
Independent evaluation results, with how each score ranks among the models in the Noumen catalog.
- Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview Low)
- DiffusionGemma
Intelligence Index
- Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview Low)29.7
- DiffusionGemma9.5
Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview Low): Better than 71% of 326 scored models
Indexes
Coding Index
Composite of the coding evaluations
- Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview Low): 68.8Top
- DiffusionGemma: 19.7
Agentic work
AutomationBench-AA
Workflow automation, penalized for guardrail violations
- Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview Low): 35.4%
- DiffusionGemma: —
AutomationBench-AA tasks completed
Workflows finished end to end without a guardrail violation
- Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview Low): 9.4%
- DiffusionGemma: —
Harvey LAB-AAv1.1
Legal tasks passed in full, with no material hallucination
- Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview Low): 0.0%
- DiffusionGemma: —
AA-Briefcasev1.1
Agentic knowledge work, rated head to head
- Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview Low): 456 Elo
- DiffusionGemma: —
GDPval-AAv2.1
Economically valuable occupational tasks, rated head to head
- Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview Low): 791 EloTop
- DiffusionGemma: 321 Elo
Document reasoning
GDP.pdf
Professional reasoning over PDF documents, all-pass rate
- Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview Low): 17.8%
- DiffusionGemma: —
AA-LCRv1.1
Reasoning across long documents
- Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview Low): 82.0%Top
- DiffusionGemma: 19.7%
MLCR-AA
Long-context reasoning over medical records
- Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview Low): 11.1%
- DiffusionGemma: —
Reasoning and knowledge
Humanity’s Last Exam
Expert-level questions across academic fields
- Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview Low): 47.0%Top
- DiffusionGemma: 10.8%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level science questions
- Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview Low): 94.1%Top
- DiffusionGemma: 66.9%
IFBench
Following precise output instructions
- Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview Low): 77.1%Top
- DiffusionGemma: 59.5%
Coding
Terminal-Benchv4.0
Practical software engineering in a terminal
- Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview Low): 4.0%
- DiffusionGemma: —
SciCode
Scientific computing in Python
- Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview Low): 58.7%
- DiffusionGemma: —
Legacy evaluations
Terminal-Bench Hard
Earlier terminal task suite
- Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview Low): 53.8%
- DiffusionGemma: —
τ²-Bench Telecom
Tool use in a customer-support simulation
- Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview Low): 95.6%
- DiffusionGemma: —
AA-LCR (unversioned)
Long-context reasoning, earlier grading
- Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview Low): 82.0%Top
- DiffusionGemma: 19.7%
Scores from Artificial Analysis, updated Oct 26, 2026. Artificial Analysis
Live routing data
Performance and reliability
Recent averages across requests routed for this model. Your own speed depends on prompt length, reasoning effort and load.
- Throughput
- 101.1 tok/s
- Faster than 59% of 250 models
- Time to first token
- 4.9 s
- Quicker than 34% of 250 models
- Prompt cache hits
- 0.0%
- About $2.00 per 1M input tokens with caching
- Request success (24h)
- 95.0%
Cache hits are the share of input tokens recently served from a prompt cache across all requests. They are not a forecast of your own hit rate.
Developers
Use it through the API
Noumen’s API is OpenAI-compatible: any Chat Completions client works with a base URL and a key.
curl https://www.noumen.xyz/api/v1/chat/completions \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $NOUMEN_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"model": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview-low",
"messages": [{ "role": "user", "content": "Explain this stack trace." }]
}'import os
from openai import OpenAI
client = OpenAI(base_url="https://www.noumen.xyz/api/v1", api_key=os.environ["NOUMEN_API_KEY"])
reply = client.chat.completions.create(
model="google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview-low",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Explain this stack trace."}],
)
print(reply.choices[0].message.content)Related models
Other Google models, starting with the same family.