NOUMENOpen app

Google · Balanced

Gemini 2.0 Pro 0205

Added Feb 5, 2025

Compare models

Choose up to 3 models to compare.1 of 3 chosen

Loading models…

Use in the app

Note: This model is now being routed to Gemini 2.5 Pro because Google no longer has the Gemini 2.0 Pro model available and Gemini 2.5 Pro is an across the board improvement.

  • Vision
  • Audio input
Input
Text, Images, Audio
Output
Text
Discovery tier
Balanced

Pricing

USD per 1M tokens
Input
$1.99
Output
$7.96
Cache read
$0.50

Reference prices as published by the model provider. API example

Specifications

Context window
2.1M
Max output
8.2K

Side by side

Gemini 2.0 Pro 0205 compared

Specifications, prices, speed and benchmark scores next to each other. Benchmarks below show every compared model too.

Compare models

Choose up to 3 models to compare.1 of 3 chosen

Loading models…

Gemini 2.0 Pro 0205GoogleThis modelGemini 2.5 Pro Experimental 0325GoogleRemove
ProviderGoogleGoogle
Discovery tierBalancedBalanced
AddedFeb 5, 2025Mar 25, 2025
Limits
Context window2.1MBest1.05M
Max output8.19K65.54KBest
Pricing, USD per 1M tokens
Input$1.99Best$2.50
Output$7.96Best$10.00
Cache read$0.50$0.25Best
Benchmark indexes
Intelligence Index8.716.1Best
Coding Index25.533.3Best
Math Index—87.7
Capabilities
ReasoningNoYes
VisionYesYes
Audio inputYesYes
Reasoning effort—low, medium, high

Public evaluations

Benchmarks

Independent evaluation results, with how each score ranks among the models in the Noumen catalog.

  • Gemini 2.0 Pro 0205
  • Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental 0325

Intelligence Index

  • Gemini 2.0 Pro 02058.7
  • Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental 032516.1

Gemini 2.0 Pro 0205: Better than 15% of 326 scored models

3.8Catalog models by score55.1

Indexes

  • Coding Index

    Composite of the coding evaluations

    • Gemini 2.0 Pro 0205: 25.5
    • Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental 0325: 33.3Top
  • Math Index

    Composite of the math evaluations

    • Gemini 2.0 Pro 0205: —
    • Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental 0325: 87.7

Agentic work

  • AutomationBench-AA

    Workflow automation, penalized for guardrail violations

    • Gemini 2.0 Pro 0205: —
    • Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental 0325: 2.2%
  • AutomationBench-AA tasks completed

    Workflows finished end to end without a guardrail violation

    • Gemini 2.0 Pro 0205: —
    • Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental 0325: 0.0%
  • AA-Briefcasev1.1

    Agentic knowledge work, rated head to head

    • Gemini 2.0 Pro 0205: —
    • Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental 0325: 302 Elo
  • GDPval-AAv2.1

    Economically valuable occupational tasks, rated head to head

    • Gemini 2.0 Pro 0205: —
    • Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental 0325: 455 Elo

Document reasoning

  • GDP.pdf

    Professional reasoning over PDF documents, all-pass rate

    • Gemini 2.0 Pro 0205: —
    • Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental 0325: 10.2%
  • AA-LCRv1.1

    Reasoning across long documents

    • Gemini 2.0 Pro 0205: —
    • Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental 0325: 69.0%
  • MLCR-AA

    Long-context reasoning over medical records

    • Gemini 2.0 Pro 0205: —
    • Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental 0325: 12.2%

Reasoning and knowledge

  • Humanity’s Last Exam

    Expert-level questions across academic fields

    • Gemini 2.0 Pro 0205: 6.2%
    • Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental 0325: 22.5%Top
  • GPQA Diamond

    Graduate-level science questions

    • Gemini 2.0 Pro 0205: 62.2%
    • Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental 0325: 84.4%Top
  • MMLU-Pro

    Multi-subject knowledge and reasoning

    • Gemini 2.0 Pro 0205: 80.5%
    • Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental 0325: 86.2%Top
  • IFBench

    Following precise output instructions

    • Gemini 2.0 Pro 0205: —
    • Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental 0325: 48.7%

Coding

  • Terminal-Benchv4.0

    Practical software engineering in a terminal

    • Gemini 2.0 Pro 0205: —
    • Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental 0325: 0.0%
  • SciCode

    Scientific computing in Python

    • Gemini 2.0 Pro 0205: —
    • Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental 0325: 46.3%
  • LiveCodeBench

    Recent competitive programming problems

    • Gemini 2.0 Pro 0205: 34.7%
    • Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental 0325: 80.1%Top

Math

  • AIME 2025

    Competition mathematics, 2025 problems

    • Gemini 2.0 Pro 0205: —
    • Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental 0325: 87.7%
  • AIME

    Competition mathematics

    • Gemini 2.0 Pro 0205: 36.0%
    • Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental 0325: 88.7%Top
  • MATH-500

    Competition math problems

    • Gemini 2.0 Pro 0205: 92.3%
    • Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental 0325: 96.7%Top

Legacy evaluations

  • Terminal-Bench Hard

    Earlier terminal task suite

    • Gemini 2.0 Pro 0205: —
    • Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental 0325: 26.5%
  • τ²-Bench Telecom

    Tool use in a customer-support simulation

    • Gemini 2.0 Pro 0205: —
    • Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental 0325: 54.1%
  • AA-LCR (unversioned)

    Long-context reasoning, earlier grading

    • Gemini 2.0 Pro 0205: —
    • Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental 0325: 69.0%

Scores from Artificial Analysis, updated Oct 26, 2026. Artificial Analysis

Live routing data

Performance and reliability

Recent averages across requests routed for this model. Your own speed depends on prompt length, reasoning effort and load.

Prompt cache hits
79.6%
About $0.80 per 1M input tokens with caching

Cache hits are the share of input tokens recently served from a prompt cache across all requests. They are not a forecast of your own hit rate.

Developers

Use it through the API

Noumen’s API is OpenAI-compatible: any Chat Completions client works with a base URL and a key.

Read the quickstart
curl https://www.noumen.xyz/api/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $NOUMEN_API_KEY" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "gemini-2.0-pro-exp-02-05",
    "messages": [{ "role": "user", "content": "Explain this stack trace." }]
  }'
import os
from openai import OpenAI

client = OpenAI(base_url="https://www.noumen.xyz/api/v1", api_key=os.environ["NOUMEN_API_KEY"])
reply = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="gemini-2.0-pro-exp-02-05",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Explain this stack trace."}],
)
print(reply.choices[0].message.content)

Google

Other Google models, starting with the same family.