DeepSeek · Open weights
DeepSeek V4 Flash
DeepSeek V4 Flash is an efficiency-optimized Mixture-of-Experts model from DeepSeek with a 1M-token context window, built for fast inference, high-throughput workloads, reasoning, coding, and agent workflows.
- Reasoning
- Tools
- Structured output
- Input
- Text
- Output
- Text
- Reasoning effort
- none · high · max
- Discovery tier
- Open weights
Pricing
USD per 1M tokens- Input
- $0.14
- Output
- $0.28
- Cache read
- $0.0028
Reference prices as published by the model provider. API example
Specifications
- Context window
- 1M
- Max output
- 384K
- Average output (7 days)
- 137 tokens
- Longer than 14% of 468 models
Side by side
DeepSeek V4 Flash compared
Specifications, prices, speed and benchmark scores next to each other. Benchmarks below show every compared model too.
| DeepSeek V4 FlashDeepSeekThis model | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash TEEDeepSeekRemove | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | DeepSeek |
| Discovery tier | Open weights | Open weights |
| Added | Apr 24, 2026 | Sep 12, 2026 |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 1.05M | 1.05M |
| Max output | 384K | 384K |
| Average output | 137 tokens | 571 tokens |
| Pricing, USD per 1M tokens | ||
| Input | $0.14Best | $0.65 |
| Output | $0.28Best | $1.45 |
| Cache read | $0.0028Best | $0.13 |
| Performance | ||
| Throughput | 74.5 tok/s | 201.1 tok/sBest |
| Time to first token | 2.2 s | 1.9 sBest |
| Request success (24h) | 99.8% | 99.9%Best |
| Benchmark indexes | ||
| Intelligence Index | 34.3Best | 24.7 |
| Coding Index | 69.1 | — |
| Capabilities | ||
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | Yes | Yes |
| Vision | No | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | Yes |
| Parallel tools | No | Yes |
| Reasoning effort | none, high, max | none, low, medium, high, max |
Public evaluations
Benchmarks
Independent evaluation results, with how each score ranks among the models in the Noumen catalog.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash TEE
Intelligence Index
- DeepSeek V4 Flash34.3
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash TEE24.7
DeepSeek V4 Flash tested at max reasoning effort
DeepSeek V4 Flash: Better than 78% of 326 scored models
Indexes
Coding Index
Composite of the coding evaluations
- DeepSeek V4 Flash: 69.1
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash TEE: —
Agentic work
AutomationBench-AA
Workflow automation, penalized for guardrail violations
- DeepSeek V4 Flash: 54.0%Top
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash TEE: 47.8%
AutomationBench-AA tasks completed
Workflows finished end to end without a guardrail violation
- DeepSeek V4 Flash: 23.0%Top
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash TEE: 14.2%
AA-Briefcasev1.1
Agentic knowledge work, rated head to head
- DeepSeek V4 Flash: 1,257 EloTop
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash TEE: 1,118 Elo
GDPval-AAv2.1
Economically valuable occupational tasks, rated head to head
- DeepSeek V4 Flash: 1,433 EloTop
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash TEE: 1,340 Elo
Document reasoning
GDP.pdf
Professional reasoning over PDF documents, all-pass rate
- DeepSeek V4 Flash: 11.0%Top
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash TEE: 3.8%
AA-LCRv1.1
Reasoning across long documents
- DeepSeek V4 Flash: 79.7%Top
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash TEE: 55.3%
Reasoning and knowledge
Humanity’s Last Exam
Expert-level questions across academic fields
- DeepSeek V4 Flash: 38.6%Top
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash TEE: 10.8%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level science questions
- DeepSeek V4 Flash: 90.8%
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash TEE: —
Coding
Terminal-Benchv4.0
Practical software engineering in a terminal
- DeepSeek V4 Flash: 12.1%Top
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash TEE: 5.6%
SciCode
Scientific computing in Python
- DeepSeek V4 Flash: 50.3%Top
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash TEE: 35.5%
Legacy evaluations
AA-LCR (unversioned)
Long-context reasoning, earlier grading
- DeepSeek V4 Flash: 79.7%Top
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash TEE: 55.3%
Scores from Artificial Analysis, updated Oct 26, 2026. DeepSeek V4 Flash was tested at max reasoning effort; compare scores measured at the same effort.Artificial Analysis
- DeepSeek V4 Flash
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash TEE
| Leaderboard | DeepSeek V4 Flash | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash TEE |
|---|---|---|
| EQ-Bench 3 | #18 · 1504 | Not in top 20 |
Ranks among Noumen catalog models on EQ-Bench leaderboards. Only top-20 placements are listed.EQ-Bench
Live routing data
Performance and reliability
Recent averages across requests routed for this model. Your own speed depends on prompt length, reasoning effort and load.
- Throughput
- 74.5 tok/s
- Faster than 49% of 254 models
- Time to first token
- 2.2 s
- Quicker than 71% of 254 models
- Prompt cache hits
- 85.9%
- About $0.0222 per 1M input tokens with caching
- Request success (24h)
- 99.8%
- Reliable
Cache hits are the share of input tokens recently served from a prompt cache across all requests. They are not a forecast of your own hit rate.
- Healthy (98% or more)
- Degraded (90–98%)
- Down (under 90%)
- No requests
Developers
Use it through the API
Noumen’s API is OpenAI-compatible: any Chat Completions client works with a base URL and a key.
curl https://www.noumen.xyz/api/v1/chat/completions \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $NOUMEN_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"model": "deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash",
"reasoning_effort": "none",
"messages": [{ "role": "user", "content": "Explain this stack trace." }]
}'import os
from openai import OpenAI
client = OpenAI(base_url="https://www.noumen.xyz/api/v1", api_key=os.environ["NOUMEN_API_KEY"])
reply = client.chat.completions.create(
model="deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Explain this stack trace."}],
)
print(reply.choices[0].message.content)DeepSeek
Related models
Other DeepSeek models, starting with the same family.