Anthropic · Frontier
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 is Anthropic's most capable Sonnet yet — a full upgrade across coding, computer use, long-context reasoning, agent planning, and design. Supports up to a 1M-token context window at Sonnet pricing.
- Reasoning
- Tools
- Vision
- Structured output
- PDF input
- Input
- Text, Images
- Output
- Text
- Reasoning effort
- low · medium · high · xhigh · max
- Discovery tier
- Frontier
Pricing
USD per 1M tokens- Input
- $3.00
- Output
- $15.00
- Cache read
- $0.30
Reference prices as published by the model provider. API example
Specifications
- Context window
- 1M
- Max output
- 128K
- Average output (7 days)
- 401 tokens
- Longer than 40% of 473 models
Side by side
Claude Sonnet 4.6 compared
Specifications, prices, speed and benchmark scores next to each other. Benchmarks below show every compared model too.
| Claude Sonnet 4.6AnthropicThis model | Claude Sonnet 5 ThinkingAnthropicRemove | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Anthropic |
| Discovery tier | Frontier | Frontier |
| Added | Feb 17, 2026 | Jun 30, 2026 |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Max output | 128K | 128K |
| Average output | 401 tokens | 2.6K tokens |
| Pricing, USD per 1M tokens | ||
| Input | $3.00 | $2.00Best |
| Output | $15.00 | $10.00Best |
| Cache read | $0.30 | $0.20Best |
| Cache write | — | $2.50 |
| Performance | ||
| Throughput | 78.6 tok/sBest | 74.8 tok/s |
| Time to first token | 1.5 sBest | 3.2 s |
| Request success (24h) | 99.5% | 100.0%Best |
| Benchmark indexes | ||
| Intelligence Index | 24.7 | 38.2Best |
| Coding Index | — | 71.5 |
| Capabilities | ||
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | Yes | Yes |
| Vision | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | Yes |
| PDF input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning effort | low, medium, high, xhigh, max | low, medium, high, xhigh, max |
Public evaluations
Benchmarks
Independent evaluation results, with how each score ranks among the models in the Noumen catalog.
- Claude Sonnet 4.6
- Claude Sonnet 5 Thinking
Intelligence Index
- Claude Sonnet 4.624.7
- Claude Sonnet 5 Thinking38.2
Claude Sonnet 4.6 tested at high reasoning effort
Claude Sonnet 4.6: Better than 60% of 326 scored models
Indexes
Coding Index
Composite of the coding evaluations
- Claude Sonnet 4.6: —
- Claude Sonnet 5 Thinking: 71.5
Agentic work
AutomationBench-AA
Workflow automation, penalized for guardrail violations
- Claude Sonnet 4.6: —
- Claude Sonnet 5 Thinking: 36.5%
AutomationBench-AA tasks completed
Workflows finished end to end without a guardrail violation
- Claude Sonnet 4.6: —
- Claude Sonnet 5 Thinking: 10.8%
AA-Briefcasev1.1
Agentic knowledge work, rated head to head
- Claude Sonnet 4.6: —
- Claude Sonnet 5 Thinking: 1,357 Elo
GDPval-AAv2.1
Economically valuable occupational tasks, rated head to head
- Claude Sonnet 4.6: —
- Claude Sonnet 5 Thinking: 1,464 Elo
Document reasoning
GDP.pdf
Professional reasoning over PDF documents, all-pass rate
- Claude Sonnet 4.6: —
- Claude Sonnet 5 Thinking: 13.2%
AA-LCRv1.1
Reasoning across long documents
- Claude Sonnet 4.6: 68.3%
- Claude Sonnet 5 Thinking: 82.0%Top
MLCR-AA
Long-context reasoning over medical records
- Claude Sonnet 4.6: —
- Claude Sonnet 5 Thinking: 5.0%
Reasoning and knowledge
Humanity’s Last Exam
Expert-level questions across academic fields
- Claude Sonnet 4.6: 13.3%
- Claude Sonnet 5 Thinking: 41.3%Top
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level science questions
- Claude Sonnet 4.6: 79.9%
- Claude Sonnet 5 Thinking: 91.1%Top
IFBench
Following precise output instructions
- Claude Sonnet 4.6: 41.2%
- Claude Sonnet 5 Thinking: —
Coding
Terminal-Benchv4.0
Practical software engineering in a terminal
- Claude Sonnet 4.6: —
- Claude Sonnet 5 Thinking: 14.1%
SciCode
Scientific computing in Python
- Claude Sonnet 4.6: —
- Claude Sonnet 5 Thinking: 54.3%
Legacy evaluations
Terminal-Bench Hard
Earlier terminal task suite
- Claude Sonnet 4.6: 46.2%
- Claude Sonnet 5 Thinking: —
τ²-Bench Telecom
Tool use in a customer-support simulation
- Claude Sonnet 4.6: 79.5%
- Claude Sonnet 5 Thinking: —
AA-LCR (unversioned)
Long-context reasoning, earlier grading
- Claude Sonnet 4.6: 68.3%
- Claude Sonnet 5 Thinking: 82.0%Top
Scores from Artificial Analysis, updated Oct 26, 2026. Claude Sonnet 4.6 was tested at high reasoning effort; compare scores measured at the same effort.Artificial Analysis
- Claude Sonnet 4.6
- Claude Sonnet 5 Thinking
| Leaderboard | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Claude Sonnet 5 Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Coding | #18 · 1528.2 | Not in top 20 |
| Longer Query | #18 · 1492.3 | Not in top 20 |
| Industry Life And Physical And Social Science | #18 · 1499.6 | Not in top 20 |
| Vision Style Control · English | #9 · 1282.8 | Not in top 20 |
| Document Overall | #8 · 1482.2 | Not in top 20 |
| Document Style Control Overall | #10 · 1477.7 | Not in top 20 |
Ranks among Noumen catalog models on LMArena leaderboards. Only top-20 placements are listed.LMArena
- Claude Sonnet 4.6
- Claude Sonnet 5 Thinking
| Leaderboard | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Claude Sonnet 5 Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | #8 · 75.2% | Not in top 20 |
Ranks among Noumen catalog models on Epoch AI leaderboards. Only top-20 placements are listed.Epoch AI
- Claude Sonnet 4.6
- Claude Sonnet 5 Thinking
| Leaderboard | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Claude Sonnet 5 Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| EQ-Bench 4 | #19 · 1200 | Not in top 20 |
| Longform Writing | #16 · 79.9 | Not in top 20 |
| EQ-Bench 3 | #5 · 1710 | Not in top 20 |
Ranks among Noumen catalog models on EQ-Bench leaderboards. Only top-20 placements are listed.EQ-Bench
- Claude Sonnet 4.6
- Claude Sonnet 5 Thinking
| Leaderboard | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Claude Sonnet 5 Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| ASCII Art | #17 · 1233 | Not in top 20 |
| Agentic Game Dev | #14 · 1140 | Not in top 20 |
| Full Stack | #14 · 1213 | Not in top 20 |
| Native Apps | #10 · 1198 | Not in top 20 |
| Mobile Apps | #13 · 1211 | Not in top 20 |
Ranks among Noumen catalog models on Design Arena leaderboards. Only top-20 placements are listed.Design Arena
Live routing data
Performance and reliability
Recent averages across requests routed for this model. Your own speed depends on prompt length, reasoning effort and load.
- Throughput
- 78.6 tok/s
- Faster than 52% of 256 models
- Time to first token
- 1.5 s
- Quicker than 85% of 256 models
- Prompt cache hits
- 38.8%
- About $1.95 per 1M input tokens with caching
- Request success (24h)
- 99.5%
- Reliable
Cache hits are the share of input tokens recently served from a prompt cache across all requests. They are not a forecast of your own hit rate.
- Healthy (98% or more)
- Degraded (90–98%)
- Down (under 90%)
- No requests
Developers
Use it through the API
Noumen’s API is OpenAI-compatible: any Chat Completions client works with a base URL and a key.
curl https://www.noumen.xyz/api/v1/chat/completions \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $NOUMEN_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6",
"reasoning_effort": "medium",
"messages": [{ "role": "user", "content": "Explain this stack trace." }]
}'import os
from openai import OpenAI
client = OpenAI(base_url="https://www.noumen.xyz/api/v1", api_key=os.environ["NOUMEN_API_KEY"])
reply = client.chat.completions.create(
model="anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Explain this stack trace."}],
)
print(reply.choices[0].message.content)Anthropic
Related models
Other Anthropic models, starting with the same family.