NOUMENOpen app
NOUMEN

Anthropic · Frontier

Claude 4.6 Opus

Added Feb 5, 2026

Compare models

Choose up to 3 models to compare.1 of 3 chosen

Loading models…

Use in the app

Claude Opus 4.6 supports advanced coding, agentic workflows, and long-context analysis with up to a 1M-token context window.

  • Reasoning
  • Tools
  • Vision
  • Structured output
  • PDF input
Input
Text, Images
Output
Text
Reasoning effort
low · medium · high · xhigh · max
Discovery tier
Frontier

Pricing

USD per 1M tokens
Input
$5.00
Output
$25.00
Cache read
$0.50

Reference prices as published by the model provider. API example

Specifications

Context window
1M
Max output
128K
Average output (7 days)
1.4K tokens
Longer than 84% of 465 models

Side by side

Claude 4.6 Opus compared

Specifications, prices, speed and benchmark scores next to each other. Benchmarks below show every compared model too.

Compare models

Choose up to 3 models to compare.1 of 3 chosen

Loading models…

Claude 4.6 OpusAnthropicThis modelSolar Pro 4upstageRemove
ProviderAnthropicupstage
Discovery tierFrontierEfficient
AddedFeb 5, 2026Aug 11, 2026
Limits
Context window1MBest524.29K
Max output128K131.07KBest
Average output1.4K tokens546 tokens
Pricing, USD per 1M tokens
Input$5.00$0.03Best
Output$25.00$0.12Best
Cache read$0.50$0.006Best
Performance
Throughput45.8 tok/s80.3 tok/sBest
Time to first token2.1 sBest2.4 s
Request success (24h)100.0%Best99.9%
Benchmark indexes
Intelligence Index26.426.6Best
Capabilities
ReasoningYesNo
ToolsYesYes
VisionYesNo
Structured outputYesYes
PDF inputYesNo
Reasoning effortlow, medium, high, xhigh, max—

Public evaluations

Benchmarks

Independent evaluation results, with how each score ranks among the models in the Noumen catalog.

  • Claude 4.6 Opus
  • Solar Pro 4

Intelligence Index

  • Claude 4.6 Opus26.4
  • Solar Pro 426.6

Claude 4.6 Opus tested at high reasoning effort

Claude 4.6 Opus: Better than 66% of 326 scored models

3.8Catalog models by score55.1

Agentic work

  • AutomationBench-AA

    Workflow automation, penalized for guardrail violations

    • Claude 4.6 Opus: —
    • Solar Pro 4: 13.6%

  • AutomationBench-AA tasks completed

    Workflows finished end to end without a guardrail violation

    • Claude 4.6 Opus: —
    • Solar Pro 4: 2.4%

  • AA-Briefcasev1.1

    Agentic knowledge work, rated head to head

    • Claude 4.6 Opus: —
    • Solar Pro 4: 1,093 Elo

  • GDPval-AAv2.1

    Economically valuable occupational tasks, rated head to head

    • Claude 4.6 Opus: —
    • Solar Pro 4: 1,106 Elo

Document reasoning

  • GDP.pdf

    Professional reasoning over PDF documents, all-pass rate

    • Claude 4.6 Opus: —
    • Solar Pro 4: 7.0%

  • AA-LCRv1.1

    Reasoning across long documents

    • Claude 4.6 Opus: 67.0%
    • Solar Pro 4: 70.7%Top

Reasoning and knowledge

  • Humanity’s Last Exam

    Expert-level questions across academic fields

    • Claude 4.6 Opus: 19.1%
    • Solar Pro 4: 29.8%Top

  • GPQA Diamond

    Graduate-level science questions

    • Claude 4.6 Opus: 84.0%
    • Solar Pro 4: 89.1%Top

  • IFBench

    Following precise output instructions

    • Claude 4.6 Opus: 44.6%
    • Solar Pro 4: —

Coding

  • Terminal-Benchv4.0

    Practical software engineering in a terminal

    • Claude 4.6 Opus: —
    • Solar Pro 4: 0.0%

  • SciCode

    Scientific computing in Python

    • Claude 4.6 Opus: —
    • Solar Pro 4: 48.0%

Legacy evaluations

  • Terminal-Bench Hard

    Earlier terminal task suite

    • Claude 4.6 Opus: 48.5%
    • Solar Pro 4: —

  • τ²-Bench Telecom

    Tool use in a customer-support simulation

    • Claude 4.6 Opus: 84.8%
    • Solar Pro 4: —

  • AA-LCR (unversioned)

    Long-context reasoning, earlier grading

    • Claude 4.6 Opus: 67.0%
    • Solar Pro 4: 70.7%Top

Scores from Artificial Analysis, updated Oct 26, 2026. Claude 4.6 Opus was tested at high reasoning effort; compare scores measured at the same effort.Artificial Analysis

Live routing data

Performance and reliability

Recent averages across requests routed for this model. Your own speed depends on prompt length, reasoning effort and load.

Throughput
45.8 tok/s
Faster than 33% of 250 models
Time to first token
2.1 s
Quicker than 72% of 250 models
Prompt cache hits
4.4%
About $4.80 per 1M input tokens with caching
Request success (24h)
100.0%
Reliable

Cache hits are the share of input tokens recently served from a prompt cache across all requests. They are not a forecast of your own hit rate.

Hourly request success · last 72 hoursLowest hour 95.8%
  • Healthy (98% or more)
  • Degraded (90–98%)
  • Down (under 90%)
  • No requests

Developers

Use it through the API

Noumen’s API is OpenAI-compatible: any Chat Completions client works with a base URL and a key.

Read the quickstart
curl https://www.noumen.xyz/api/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $NOUMEN_API_KEY" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "anthropic/claude-opus-4.6",
    "reasoning_effort": "medium",
    "messages": [{ "role": "user", "content": "Explain this stack trace." }]
  }'
import os
from openai import OpenAI

client = OpenAI(base_url="https://www.noumen.xyz/api/v1", api_key=os.environ["NOUMEN_API_KEY"])
reply = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="anthropic/claude-opus-4.6",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Explain this stack trace."}],
)
print(reply.choices[0].message.content)

Anthropic

Other Anthropic models, starting with the same family.