Z.ai · Open weights
GLM 5.3 Flash TEE
GLM-5.3 Flash is Z.AI's natively multimodal 320B MoE reasoning model with 18B active parameters. This TEE deployment is verified through Redpill attestation with signed completion receipts.
- Reasoning
- Tools
- Vision
- Structured output
- Parallel tools
- Input
- Text, Images
- Output
- Text
- Reasoning effort
- low · high · max
- Discovery tier
- Open weights
Pricing
USD per 1M tokens- Input
- $0.15
- Output
- $0.50
- Cache read
- $0.03
Reference prices as published by the model provider. API example
Specifications
- Context window
- 1M
- Max output
- 131.1K
- Average output (7 days)
- 845 tokens
- Longer than 66% of 465 models
Side by side
GLM 5.3 Flash TEE compared
Specifications, prices, speed and benchmark scores next to each other. Benchmarks below show every compared model too.
| GLM 5.3 Flash TEEZ.aiThis model | GLM 4.7 FlashZ.aiRemove | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai | Z.ai |
| Discovery tier | Open weights | Open weights |
| Added | Aug 28, 2026 | Jan 19, 2026 |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 1.05MBest | 200K |
| Max output | 131.07KBest | 128K |
| Average output | 845 tokens | 86 tokens |
| Pricing, USD per 1M tokens | ||
| Input | $0.15 | $0.07Best |
| Output | $0.50 | $0.40Best |
| Cache read | $0.03 | $0.01Best |
| Performance | ||
| Throughput | 75.4 tok/sBest | 51.4 tok/s |
| Time to first token | 3.8 sBest | 3.8 s |
| Request success (24h) | 99.9% | 100.0%Best |
| Benchmark indexes | ||
| Intelligence Index | 41.8Best | 10.6 |
| Coding Index | 71.5 | — |
| Capabilities | ||
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | Yes | Yes |
| Vision | Yes | No |
| Structured output | Yes | Yes |
| Parallel tools | Yes | No |
| Reasoning effort | low, high, max | — |
Public evaluations
Benchmarks
Independent evaluation results, with how each score ranks among the models in the Noumen catalog.
- GLM 5.3 Flash TEE
- GLM 4.7 Flash
Intelligence Index
- GLM 5.3 Flash TEE41.8
- GLM 4.7 Flash10.6
GLM 5.3 Flash TEE: Better than 86% of 326 scored models
Indexes
Coding Index
Composite of the coding evaluations
- GLM 5.3 Flash TEE: 71.5
- GLM 4.7 Flash: —
Agentic work
AutomationBench-AA
Workflow automation, penalized for guardrail violations
- GLM 5.3 Flash TEE: 60.4%
- GLM 4.7 Flash: —
AutomationBench-AA tasks completed
Workflows finished end to end without a guardrail violation
- GLM 5.3 Flash TEE: 25.4%
- GLM 4.7 Flash: —
Harvey LAB-AAv1.1
Legal tasks passed in full, with no material hallucination
- GLM 5.3 Flash TEE: 0.8%
- GLM 4.7 Flash: —
AA-Briefcasev1.1
Agentic knowledge work, rated head to head
- GLM 5.3 Flash TEE: 1,452 Elo
- GLM 4.7 Flash: —
GDPval-AAv2.1
Economically valuable occupational tasks, rated head to head
- GLM 5.3 Flash TEE: 1,642 Elo
- GLM 4.7 Flash: —
Document reasoning
GDP.pdf
Professional reasoning over PDF documents, all-pass rate
- GLM 5.3 Flash TEE: 15.4%
- GLM 4.7 Flash: —
AA-LCRv1.1
Reasoning across long documents
- GLM 5.3 Flash TEE: 80.0%Top
- GLM 4.7 Flash: 20.3%
MLCR-AA
Long-context reasoning over medical records
- GLM 5.3 Flash TEE: 11.7%
- GLM 4.7 Flash: —
Reasoning and knowledge
Humanity’s Last Exam
Expert-level questions across academic fields
- GLM 5.3 Flash TEE: 39.9%Top
- GLM 4.7 Flash: 5.0%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level science questions
- GLM 5.3 Flash TEE: 91.2%Top
- GLM 4.7 Flash: 45.2%
IFBench
Following precise output instructions
- GLM 5.3 Flash TEE: —
- GLM 4.7 Flash: 46.3%
Coding
Terminal-Benchv4.0
Practical software engineering in a terminal
- GLM 5.3 Flash TEE: 32.8%
- GLM 4.7 Flash: —
SciCode
Scientific computing in Python
- GLM 5.3 Flash TEE: 51.6%
- GLM 4.7 Flash: —
Legacy evaluations
Terminal-Bench Hard
Earlier terminal task suite
- GLM 5.3 Flash TEE: —
- GLM 4.7 Flash: 3.8%
τ²-Bench Telecom
Tool use in a customer-support simulation
- GLM 5.3 Flash TEE: —
- GLM 4.7 Flash: 91.8%
AA-LCR (unversioned)
Long-context reasoning, earlier grading
- GLM 5.3 Flash TEE: 80.0%Top
- GLM 4.7 Flash: 20.3%
Scores from Artificial Analysis, updated Oct 26, 2026. Artificial Analysis
Live routing data
Performance and reliability
Recent averages across requests routed for this model. Your own speed depends on prompt length, reasoning effort and load.
- Throughput
- 75.4 tok/s
- Faster than 51% of 250 models
- Time to first token
- 3.8 s
- Quicker than 48% of 250 models
- Prompt cache hits
- 95.9%
- About $0.0349 per 1M input tokens with caching
- Request success (24h)
- 99.9%
- Reliable
Cache hits are the share of input tokens recently served from a prompt cache across all requests. They are not a forecast of your own hit rate.
- Healthy (98% or more)
- Degraded (90–98%)
- Down (under 90%)
- No requests
Developers
Use it through the API
Noumen’s API is OpenAI-compatible: any Chat Completions client works with a base URL and a key.
curl https://www.noumen.xyz/api/v1/chat/completions \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $NOUMEN_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"model": "TEE/glm-5.3-flash",
"reasoning_effort": "low",
"messages": [{ "role": "user", "content": "Explain this stack trace." }]
}'import os
from openai import OpenAI
client = OpenAI(base_url="https://www.noumen.xyz/api/v1", api_key=os.environ["NOUMEN_API_KEY"])
reply = client.chat.completions.create(
model="TEE/glm-5.3-flash",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Explain this stack trace."}],
)
print(reply.choices[0].message.content)Z.ai
Related models
Other Z.ai models, starting with the same family.