Google · Open weights
Gemma 4 31B Thinking TEE
Google's Gemma 4 31B instruction-tuned model in a Trusted Execution Environment (TEE) with thinking explicitly enabled and provider attestation support.
- Reasoning
- Tools
- Vision
- Structured output
- Input
- Text, Images
- Output
- Text
- Discovery tier
- Open weights
Pricing
USD per 1M tokens- Input
- $0.40
- Output
- $1.00
- Cache read
- $0.40
Reference prices as published by the model provider. API example
Specifications
- Context window
- 262.1K
- Max output
- 131.1K
- Average output (7 days)
- 1.1K tokens
- Longer than 75% of 468 models
Side by side
Compare models
Put Gemma 4 31B Thinking TEE next to up to three other models. The comparison stays in the link, so you can share it.
Public evaluations
Benchmarks
Independent evaluation results, with how each score ranks among the models in the Noumen catalog.
Intelligence Index
14.7
Better than 35% of 326 scored models
Indexes
Coding Index
43.4Composite of the coding evaluations
Better than 33% of 168 scored models
Agentic work
AutomationBench-AA
4.9%Workflow automation, penalized for guardrail violations
Better than 27% of 173 scored models
AutomationBench-AA tasks completed
0.5%Workflows finished end to end without a guardrail violation
Better than 24% of 173 scored models
AA-Briefcasev1.1
368 EloAgentic knowledge work, rated head to head
Better than 11% of 166 scored models
GDPval-AAv2.1
619 EloEconomically valuable occupational tasks, rated head to head
Better than 17% of 187 scored models
Document reasoning
GDP.pdf
6.0%Professional reasoning over PDF documents, all-pass rate
Better than 25% of 171 scored models
AA-LCRv1.1
69.7%Reasoning across long documents
Better than 49% of 309 scored models
Reasoning and knowledge
Humanity’s Last Exam
23.6%Expert-level questions across academic fields
Better than 52% of 323 scored models
GPQA Diamond
85.7%Graduate-level science questions
Better than 61% of 291 scored models
IFBench
75.6%Following precise output instructions
Better than 84% of 215 scored models
Coding
Terminal-Benchv4.0
0.0%Practical software engineering in a terminal
Better than 0% of 171 scored models
SciCode
45.5%Scientific computing in Python
Better than 32% of 174 scored models
Legacy evaluations
Terminal-Bench Hard
36.4%Earlier terminal task suite
Better than 70% of 212 scored models
τ²-Bench Telecom
59.9%Tool use in a customer-support simulation
Better than 45% of 214 scored models
AA-LCR (unversioned)
69.7%Long-context reasoning, earlier grading
Better than 49% of 309 scored models
Scores from Artificial Analysis, updated Oct 26, 2026. Artificial Analysis
Live routing data
Performance and reliability
Recent averages across requests routed for this model. Your own speed depends on prompt length, reasoning effort and load.
- Prompt cache hits
- 30.1%
- About $0.40 per 1M input tokens with caching
- Request success (24h)
- 80.3%
- Unstable
Cache hits are the share of input tokens recently served from a prompt cache across all requests. They are not a forecast of your own hit rate.
- Healthy (98% or more)
- Degraded (90–98%)
- Down (under 90%)
- No requests
Developers
Use it through the API
Noumen’s API is OpenAI-compatible: any Chat Completions client works with a base URL and a key.
curl https://www.noumen.xyz/api/v1/chat/completions \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $NOUMEN_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"model": "TEE/gemma4-31b:thinking",
"messages": [{ "role": "user", "content": "Explain this stack trace." }]
}'import os
from openai import OpenAI
client = OpenAI(base_url="https://www.noumen.xyz/api/v1", api_key=os.environ["NOUMEN_API_KEY"])
reply = client.chat.completions.create(
model="TEE/gemma4-31b:thinking",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Explain this stack trace."}],
)
print(reply.choices[0].message.content)Related models
Other Google models, starting with the same family.